When I try to login SSH using SecureCRT Software, following error it show.
A public key file has not been specified for the session. would you like to specify one now.
I am using CPanel.
if it's possible to log all ssh commands to a file by session. For example, if I log in as user 'test123', once I close the session, all commands I ran will be saved to a file and either emailed to my server logs email address or saved to a file.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have just got a resellers VPS and my host installed HyperVM 2.0 and when I logged in it works but then I get logout and then get this error:
IP Address Changed Amidst Session. Possible Session Hijacking.
then it takes my host admin time to fix it and now they will not do any think so i can not now use it (login). Not Good is there something I can do?
all I can think is that it is my ISP IP (Dynamic IP Address) which keeps changing.
I'm build Plesk Panel for Linux and Presence Builder, I don't want my user can upload their website to hosting via File Manager. How can I do it...
View 2 Replies View RelatedI heard the other day from a very reliable source that this is a fact and they expect it to happen sooner rather than later. Since they seem to set the bar anyway seems it was only a matter of time. Anyone else aware of this or am I the only one? Searched the forum before I posted and nothing came up. Seems like a significant development to me...
View 14 Replies View RelatedIm planning on using WAMPserver2 on our web server to host our website. Now, as far as I can tell, WAMPserver2 was mostly created to allow you to do work locally. Is there any known problem with using this software on a web server publically?
View 3 Replies View RelatedYou are hosting your web site on a local server and you have the DNS pointing to the LOCAL (read: not public) IP on your LAN which means only you and those on your LOCAL network can access the site.
192.168.1.8 is a LOCAL (PRIVATE) IP.
I'm on a reseller cPanel WHM account with shell access, and this public FTP for uploading maps for a game.
How do I ban FTP users by their IP? (.htaccess wouldn't do the trick)
How do I regulate priviledges/permissions of FTP users?
How do I control (like configuring how the indexing is displayed, for example) /public_html/somedirectory/ through /public_html/.htaccess?
How do I disallow certain filetypes from existing in /public_html/somedirectory/* or to be uploaded?
How do I disallow apache from rendering any html, php, cgi, java, perl, etc files in /public_html/somedirectory/*?
So, if you had a public FTP (not the "anonymous FTP" cPanel can create, but a regular and single user account shared by everyone), how would you protect your free map hosting service from abuse? What protections would you setup? Etc.
we are looking for a provider that provides public ip vlans' with dedicated server purchases,
so far,,
we have found few companies that offer this at no extra charge or minimal extra charge
1) softlayer (best choice)
2) singlehop
3) nocster/burst.net (not a good provider for business hosting / not reliable / no phone support)
does anyone know of any other dedicated server providers that offer public ip vlans for no extra charge or minimal extra charge?
we have a server with customers
now there are any customer that must can 'include' form php a class that we must put out of customer path...
a customer must can include a class that is out of /home/public_html/customerlogin/*
how is possible to make this?
we have this Juniper SSG5 firewall, our very first Juniper and wanted to use it.
While I am able to use it in NAT mode, I have been unsuccessful to use it in route mode.
We have Public IPs from the same segment and I wanted to use it with the firewall but it appears that I can't assign IPs for each port if the IP is from the same segment.
Does it mean that we can't use it other than in NAT mode?
What we want to accomplish is to have one of IPs to act as gateway and filter or route in/out traffic to/from our other IPs.
Due to an emergency with our colo space, we are missing a switch.
As a very temporary measure, would it be possible to put both our public traffic and private traffic (10.0.0.0/8) on the same switch without a VLAN?
Essentially we'd be connecting both the trusted and external side of our (natting) firewall to the same switch, along with our servers (which have private IP's).
What are the security risks of this?
I am looking to migrate from dedicated box with windows server 2012 R2 and plesk 12 over to amazon ec2.
so setup a test server on ec2.
Plesk only shows the private IP, how do I add the public IP ?
Is it even possible ?
I regret to bring this to a public forum but having seen that solarvps has a presence here I am hoping that a resolve to this issue can be found, and any public opinions are welcomed.
Having been a customer with solarvps since 2006 without any cause for concerns it does not make me happy with some recent issues I have had with them. So I have had a vps server hosted with them since 2006. Sometime in February when attempting to login to my VPS I got an error, I left it as this happens sometimes, it happened for 4 days in a row so I thought this is a little strange logged in to my control panel, to see no VPS server was listed under the account. There was no invoice generated either. Ok this is strange but I just assumed it had been terminated, no invoice came through and that particular server was a backup server so I sought hosting elsewhere.
4 months pass I get an email from solarvps stating my account is overdue with charges applied. I contact them back straight away asking what they are billing me for I have explained the situation time and again to them, I have asked the questions why the server disappeared from my account, why I wasn’t able to access the vps remotely and why no invoices got generated at the time to which I have had no response, I have asked more than 5 times now. The only response I keep getting form them is threats if I do not pay to hand over to a collection agency and the possibility of legal action. To which I have replied each time that I will contest any such action and seek legal advice myself.
Granted I should probably have contacted them at the time but really they are at fault more than I am for not asking them what has happened, I truly believe I am not in the wrong here but nobody within solarvps is prepared is looking at the facts of what has happened here.
Well anyway I hope bringing this to a public forum will bring a resolve and maybe some answers. I am getting no response from anybody within solarvps and would be happy to take this away from the public if they are willing.
I am not unfair nor does it make sense that a customer for so long would just decide not to pay you one month and kick up a fuss over such a small amount of money but the fact that I am not in the wrong with this matter, I am not prepared to pay them no matter how much bullying tactics they wish to adopt in trying to make me.
I would like to know there is any.
View 14 Replies View RelatedCurrently we are running a very successful site for extreme sports. We have just spent 6 months on development of our new site which we will launch in a fortnight. This will free up some of my time to look at other areas and avenues to attract members.
Personally I would love to run a hotmail style service on our website, and believe this would help with the growth of our online community.
Just interested in advice from others on areas to be aware and alert when running a service like this?
I am also trying to make the decision between SocketMail or Atmail. If anyone has opinions on these, or an alternative solution i'm all for that advice too.
Basically at this point I am wanting to get as much advice together as possible, then look to making an informed decision to go ahead or not.
Currently we operate off a dedicated server and i realise this may have to become two servers in the near future with such a service. It is fully managed by myself, and a 3rd party individual I hire to maintain the server on a monthly basis.
How do you guys deny run of perl/bash scripts from /tmp, /var/tmp, /dev/shm? I've tried to build simple shell wrapper, but that's not a compromise if you run for example spamassassin on the same server (it needs direct io to/from perl binary). I'm looking intro some kind of binary wrapper or patch that will deny running perl scripts from public folders (also the same for shell scripts will be great). Any ideas or solutions?
If anyone interested in primitive shell wrapper code:
Code:
#!/bin/sh
ARGS=`echo $@ | grep -v "/tmp/"`
if [ "$ARGS" != "" ]; then
/usr/bin/perl.orig $ARGS;
fi
I often need to access my sites from public places, which are behind firewalls, don't have access to hard disk and any Windows tool (just plain internet access).
Problem: firewall, closed ports: 8082 (cPanel), 2078 (SSL; I don't know, if I'll need this), 2077 and maybe others.
Which hosting features I need? to be able to
1. access cpanel, when port 8082 is closed (I was using cpanelproxy.net until now with success).
2. for uploading files from other websites directly to my website (without prior downloading on a PC hard disc) - I've herad SSH should work, but what exact SSH I need - any experience someone? Any other solution? I was trying WEb Disc feature in cPanel11 but it needs port 2078 or 2077 open...
I was worry about which is more seucre to login to the server
disabling the direct login and using the public key (ssh-dss) with 2084 bit length ?
or use the direct login?
and if the public key is more secure , should we use passphrase when generating the key? or no?
I need to make this writeable but I can't find it on my server with my FTPclient. Can someone tell me what it is and where it's likely to be?
Maybe I have to create one?
I have a large survey (I use phpsurveyor) on my reseller webdomain running. It takes about 30 minutes to fill in the complete survey. After 24 minutes my respondents get a session error and their data is lost.
I tried to solve this with a .htaccess
php_value max_execution_time 600
php_value session.gc_maxlifetime 3000
php_value session.cookie_lifetime 3000
With phpinfo.php I can see that the Local Values are session.gc_maxlifetime 3000 and session.cookie_lifetime 3000.
I have got error:
Code:
Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter -
headers already sent (output started at /home/myhope/public_html/pro/index.php:1) in /home/myhope/public_html/pro/index.php on line 2
It could've gone into the php section as well...I think.
I got a dedicated server 2 days ago, but the "session.save_path" is not set. What I did was create a "php.ini" file, put the following code into it and uploaded it to my public directory.
Quote:
session.save_path = "/var/www/vhosts/contrid.com/subdomains/projects/httpdocs/tmp"
...but I'm not sure if this is right.
Unfortunately it doesn't work, therefore I'm making this post.
If anyone can help me, it will be greatly appreciated.
**
This is for a subdomain.
**
When i try to login my linux server from GUI i put my username "root" and then put the password, i am not able to login and getting following error
"Your session only lasted less then 10 sec. If you have not logged out yourself this could mean that there is some installation problem of that you may be out of disk space. Try logging in with one of the failsafe sessions to see if you can fix this problem view details in ~/.xsession.error file "
Does any one know about this error.
when I install Joomla, it said session.save_path = /tmp is unwriteable. however, following phpinfo(), the session.save_path on server is /tmp, and all my php sites are working fine, I can see many sess_ files in /tmp. That means the sessions are still written into /tmp by user apache, is that correct?
so, why Joomla instalation saying it's unwriteable? i am on a linux server
I work alot on the road and need a way to securely connect
at public WiFi hotspots all over.....
I am considering getting the VPN service from StrongVPN.com
if it is possible to setup a page like this with their public reports feature?
[url]
I tried looking for Pingdom forums, but they seem to be offline.
The only main difference I see between 2848 (48 ports) and 2650 (48 ports) is the vast difference in thoroughput and switching capacity, 2848 (Throughput: Up to 69.8 mpps; Switching capacity: 96 Gbps) having a higher capacity and 2650 (Throughput: 10.1 million pps; Routing/switching capacity: 13.6 Gbps).
So now, if there is a public switch for http/ftp/ssh and private switch for backups and there are about 35 servers connected to each switch, does it make sense if I go with 2800 for the private switch and 2600 for the public?
The basis of my conclusion is that on a public port with limited bandwidth, a user cannot continuously push close to 100mbps for long before running out of bandwidth. But on a private switch where the user has unlimited bandwidth and can push 100mbps continuously for longer periods and some of the users on the private switch might also have 1gbps port access.
