I tried to update the virtuozzo using command vzup2date on main node as root user, & i'm getting this error
Code:
тттттттттттттттттЄ Error checking dependencies тттттттттттттттттт
т т
т [RPM] Dependencies conflict. т
т kernel >= 2.4.20-021stab022 is needed by т
т vzmigrate-4.0.0-141.i386 т
т kernel >= 2.4.20-019stab027 is needed by т
т vzstat-4.0.0-32.i386 т
т т
т т
т No changes were made to the file system yet. Please т
т correct the above errors and run vzup2date again. т
The current installed kernel is 2.6.18-028stab059.6 on centos 5.4.
While Installing Applications on VPS Container On virtuozzo I`am running Into a error given below.
Operation install with the Env(s) "web209" is finished with errors: Can not install packages: exec failed: Error: python-devel conflicts with python < 2.4.3-27.el5 Error: Missing Dependency: gnutls = 1.4.1-3.el5_2.1 is needed by package gnutls-devel Error: Missing Dependency: nspr = 4.7.4-1.el5_3.1 is needed by package nspr-devel Error: /usr/share/vzyum/bin/yum failed, exitcode=1 .
I was just curious as to how virtuozzo manages the cpu usage. Do all VPS's just use as much cpu as they can at one time or is there a min and max limit?
We're currently using virtuozzo and have been but we are thinking of starting a Xen server as our techs have the technical expertise to manage a Xen server. I'm just wondering whether we would be better off with this or not, compared to Virtuozzo.
I've noticed a lot of the recommended VPS' are using Virtuozzo (e.g. KickAssVPS and WiredTree). Can anyone recommend good Windows VPS that utilize other software (ESX, Xen, Hyper-V)?
I installed Apf on Virtuozzo VE, which went well until I enabled it. I could not access Plesk installed on the machine, then I realized it was listening to port 8880 from the Service VE as well as 8443. Enabling 8880 in the common ports solved the problem, but I only want it blocked for everything BUT the Service VE.
I looked in the manual and the section that discusses adding custom rules for aliases only has a header and does not have any description.
Anyone know how to block port 8880 to the world but allow 8880 to a particular IP?
We are having an issue when trying to cache Fedora Core 10.
Code:
vzpkg create cache fedora-core-10-x86_64 Creation OS template cache for fedora-core-10-x86_64 template Error: Python directory not found in /vz/pkgenv/rpm46x64 Error: Can't find environment directory /vz/pkgenv/rpm46x64: No such file or directory
The only recent changes that have been made is the Hostname. Before making this change, I was caching OS templates like it was christmas.
I've read that Virtuozzo 4.0 supported ipv6. I'm having problems finding anything to help setup the node for ipv6. I can't anything on the web except for some people talking about how to disable ipv6. So I was just wondering if anyone else has seen anything.
Edit: I don't think I posted in the correct section. Opps. Could a moderator move this to the right section?
I have an main server which has ssh configured that it connects to main vz server without password. How to connect to all vz servers and lets say do command cat /etc/resolv.conf and send result to my email address?
I believe it should be something like this:
ssh server1;vzlist ..;vzenter 1$,2$;cat /etc/resolv.conf | mail bla@blah.com....;ssh server2;vzlist ..;vzeneter... and so on so forth.
I got a Virtuozzo VPS couple a days ago and I am having some problems with it. I can't get a hold of the host because he/she is "migrating" company website at the moment.
VPS OS - Ubuntu 8.04 32-bit (Initially was 64-bit but I can't even get SSH to work. The host reloaded with 32-bit.)
Initially I was getting some permission problem on /dev/null for regular users. I fixed that with following and stick it in /etc/rc.local
chmod go+rw /dev/null
Now I can't get screen to work. It said something about "No More PTYs.".
Has the VZ bug where "doing a Windows Update on a node applies it to the whole server and then reboots the node" been fixed yet. We offer Linux VPS using VZ and was going to use it for Windows too but when I heard that I put the plan on hold.
because Virtuozzo is charged, i think it may more easy to manage for admin and user, xen has it's own feature than Virtuozzo,but i feel hypervm is not very friendly to use ( my personal feeling)
We have a client on a VPS (Virtuozzo) that is failing PCI Compliance through McAfee as the port for the "power panel" in Viruozzo uses week SSL encryption.
Since we can't block the port (as users need to be able to access it) does anyone know how we can possibly upgrade that or change things so that it will pass compliance?
All other ports on the server are fine, but the port 4643 keeps failing under the ScanAlert scans: Low Strength Ciphers (< 56-bit key) SSLv2 EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC2(40) Mac=MD5 export EXP-RC4-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC4(40) Mac=MD5 export SSLv3 EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=DH(512) Au=RSA Enc=DES(40) Mac=SHA1 export EXP-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=DES(40) Mac=SHA1 export EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC2(40) Mac=MD5 export EXP-RC4-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC4(40) Mac=MD5 export TLSv1 EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=DH(512) Au=RSA Enc=DES(40) Mac=SHA1 export EXP-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=DES(40) Mac=SHA1 export EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC2(40) Mac=MD5 export EXP-RC4-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC4(40) Mac=MD5 export Medium Strength Ciphers (>= 56-bit and < 112-bit key) SSLv2 DES-CBC-MD5 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=MD5 RC4-64-MD5 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=RC4(64) Mac=MD5 SSLv3 EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=DH Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=SHA1 DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=SHA1 TLSv1 EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=DH Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=SHA1 DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=SHA1
Anyone have any suggestions on how we can resolve this issue for the client?
Does anyone know the basic information for the Virtuozzo API? We are working with Matt from WHMCS to create a custom module for Virtuozzo to auto provision VPS's however the API docs we submitted were not sufficient as there were no clear "functions".
I would like to know which clients would prefer Virtuozzo over HyperVM. Lets say there is a company offering Virtuozzo on there servers. However, there is another company offering HyperVM for a cheaper price. Neither companies are overselling. Would you be willing to pay the extra money for Virtuozzo? Or would you be happy with OpenVZ and HyperVM.
Does any dedicated server provider give a Virtuozzo license with unlimited VEs? I've noticed that most of them give 3, 10, or max. 100. Do you have any idea why wouldn't they give a license for unlimited VEs and why are they restricting the number of VEs that we can create on a server since, as far as I've understood, Viruozzo provides license considering the CPU no.s, but not the number of VEs.
I would like to know which one is better for running java application in term of performance or stability. 16Gb RAM server 15 clients on Virtuozzo or Xen. 1Gb RAM each client.
I found out that once I enable CSF it will automatically enable the virtuozza firewall with the default policy "drop anything".
My provider updated all VPS and they updated virtuozza to "parallels infrastructure manager" ..which is still virtuozza but a little bit different.
I double-checked it and anytime I restart csf to apply the new rules it will add the default policy "drop". I can change it back to default accept but obviously if I restart again it will block me out.
This is pretty strange. Once CSF is disabled and I use Virtuozza FW only everything is working.
I'm colo'ing, so this wouldn't be shared with anyone else.
I'm looking at using iscsi with Virtuozzo Containers, and while the setup for the hardware nodes seems fairly straightforward, can anyone comment on their own experiences using iscsi with VZ?
Did you find your experience reliable? Slow? Any information will be useful.
Also, did you have a hard time setting things up? Or did VZ just manage everything as if it was still on a single server?
