I found out that once I enable CSF it will automatically enable the virtuozza firewall with the default policy "drop anything".
My provider updated all VPS and they updated virtuozza to "parallels infrastructure manager" ..which is still virtuozza but a little bit different.
I double-checked it and anytime I restart csf to apply the new rules it will add the default policy "drop". I can change it back to default accept but obviously if I restart again it will block me out.
This is pretty strange. Once CSF is disabled and I use Virtuozza FW only everything is working.
I'm trying to iron out this huge bug with Postfix. Right now I am stuck in a hole. I am trying to disable Postfix from relaying e-mail sent to my server. When I send e-mail without "relay_domains", I get a "554 Relay Access Denied" error. When I supply a "relay_domains" variable to Postfix, I get "mail for example.com loops back to myself" for an error.
I was skimming over the Postfix docs and it said you can make these errors go away with a "virtual_mailbox_domains" or "virtual_alias_domains" variable. My config has "virtual_mailbox_domains" but still these errors appear.
Is there a way to fix this, or a way to disable Postfix from relaying e-mail?
I am trying to install Sendmail on my server and I keep getting messages to remove Postfix. My server is running Debian 3.1 (Sarge) and without Sendmail, I cannot use the PHP mail function. The PHP config is set to use Sendmail for the mail function, but I don't know how to correct it. However, without Postfix, my control panel will not function properly.
Here is my control panel's software list (required to run):
how to reconfigure PHP to replace the "sendmail -t -i" command for the mail function or just how to fix it. The problem is to get the mail function in PHP to work. So I'd say the best choice would be to find another mail program to replace Sendmail and to reconfigure PHP. Any help is appreciated.
Please helo me to resole this problem with Serv-U FTP
When Windows Firewall is turn off, i can access to folder. However, Firewall is turn off, i cannot access to folder with error following : The connection with server was reset. I config windows firewall to open port :21,20. OS: windows 2003 server service pack 2.
I recently upgraded my server and it is using Apache 2.2.3. I have all the same server directives as before when I was using an early version of Apache 2. The problem is that when I have RewriteEngine On, my cgi scripts generate a forbidden error. If I comment out that line, they go back to working again.
Im considering Suhosin, in fact i am using it in other plain server were i have 1 or 2 sites. But this is a very high traffic with 300 + sites, lot of sites are using cms apps..
I was just curious as to how virtuozzo manages the cpu usage. Do all VPS's just use as much cpu as they can at one time or is there a min and max limit?
We're currently using virtuozzo and have been but we are thinking of starting a Xen server as our techs have the technical expertise to manage a Xen server. I'm just wondering whether we would be better off with this or not, compared to Virtuozzo.
I've noticed a lot of the recommended VPS' are using Virtuozzo (e.g. KickAssVPS and WiredTree). Can anyone recommend good Windows VPS that utilize other software (ESX, Xen, Hyper-V)?
I installed Apf on Virtuozzo VE, which went well until I enabled it. I could not access Plesk installed on the machine, then I realized it was listening to port 8880 from the Service VE as well as 8443. Enabling 8880 in the common ports solved the problem, but I only want it blocked for everything BUT the Service VE.
I looked in the manual and the section that discusses adding custom rules for aliases only has a header and does not have any description.
Anyone know how to block port 8880 to the world but allow 8880 to a particular IP?
We are having an issue when trying to cache Fedora Core 10.
Code:
vzpkg create cache fedora-core-10-x86_64 Creation OS template cache for fedora-core-10-x86_64 template Error: Python directory not found in /vz/pkgenv/rpm46x64 Error: Can't find environment directory /vz/pkgenv/rpm46x64: No such file or directory
The only recent changes that have been made is the Hostname. Before making this change, I was caching OS templates like it was christmas.
I've read that Virtuozzo 4.0 supported ipv6. I'm having problems finding anything to help setup the node for ipv6. I can't anything on the web except for some people talking about how to disable ipv6. So I was just wondering if anyone else has seen anything.
Edit: I don't think I posted in the correct section. Opps. Could a moderator move this to the right section?
I have an main server which has ssh configured that it connects to main vz server without password. How to connect to all vz servers and lets say do command cat /etc/resolv.conf and send result to my email address?
I believe it should be something like this:
ssh server1;vzlist ..;vzenter 1$,2$;cat /etc/resolv.conf | mail bla@blah.com....;ssh server2;vzlist ..;vzeneter... and so on so forth.
I got a Virtuozzo VPS couple a days ago and I am having some problems with it. I can't get a hold of the host because he/she is "migrating" company website at the moment.
VPS OS - Ubuntu 8.04 32-bit (Initially was 64-bit but I can't even get SSH to work. The host reloaded with 32-bit.)
Initially I was getting some permission problem on /dev/null for regular users. I fixed that with following and stick it in /etc/rc.local
chmod go+rw /dev/null
Now I can't get screen to work. It said something about "No More PTYs.".
Has the VZ bug where "doing a Windows Update on a node applies it to the whole server and then reboots the node" been fixed yet. We offer Linux VPS using VZ and was going to use it for Windows too but when I heard that I put the plan on hold.
because Virtuozzo is charged, i think it may more easy to manage for admin and user, xen has it's own feature than Virtuozzo,but i feel hypervm is not very friendly to use ( my personal feeling)
We have a client on a VPS (Virtuozzo) that is failing PCI Compliance through McAfee as the port for the "power panel" in Viruozzo uses week SSL encryption.
Since we can't block the port (as users need to be able to access it) does anyone know how we can possibly upgrade that or change things so that it will pass compliance?
All other ports on the server are fine, but the port 4643 keeps failing under the ScanAlert scans: Low Strength Ciphers (< 56-bit key) SSLv2 EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC2(40) Mac=MD5 export EXP-RC4-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC4(40) Mac=MD5 export SSLv3 EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=DH(512) Au=RSA Enc=DES(40) Mac=SHA1 export EXP-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=DES(40) Mac=SHA1 export EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC2(40) Mac=MD5 export EXP-RC4-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC4(40) Mac=MD5 export TLSv1 EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=DH(512) Au=RSA Enc=DES(40) Mac=SHA1 export EXP-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=DES(40) Mac=SHA1 export EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC2(40) Mac=MD5 export EXP-RC4-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC4(40) Mac=MD5 export Medium Strength Ciphers (>= 56-bit and < 112-bit key) SSLv2 DES-CBC-MD5 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=MD5 RC4-64-MD5 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=RC4(64) Mac=MD5 SSLv3 EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=DH Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=SHA1 DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=SHA1 TLSv1 EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=DH Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=SHA1 DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=DES(56) Mac=SHA1
Anyone have any suggestions on how we can resolve this issue for the client?
Does anyone know the basic information for the Virtuozzo API? We are working with Matt from WHMCS to create a custom module for Virtuozzo to auto provision VPS's however the API docs we submitted were not sufficient as there were no clear "functions".
I would like to know which clients would prefer Virtuozzo over HyperVM. Lets say there is a company offering Virtuozzo on there servers. However, there is another company offering HyperVM for a cheaper price. Neither companies are overselling. Would you be willing to pay the extra money for Virtuozzo? Or would you be happy with OpenVZ and HyperVM.
Does any dedicated server provider give a Virtuozzo license with unlimited VEs? I've noticed that most of them give 3, 10, or max. 100. Do you have any idea why wouldn't they give a license for unlimited VEs and why are they restricting the number of VEs that we can create on a server since, as far as I've understood, Viruozzo provides license considering the CPU no.s, but not the number of VEs.
I would like to know which one is better for running java application in term of performance or stability. 16Gb RAM server 15 clients on Virtuozzo or Xen. 1Gb RAM each client.
