i have a server and let friends put images on it,
i find some people put big .zip and .iso files on it,
it make my server waste many bandwinth and make the images show lower and lower,
can i install any software to do the control,
to make "if user browse .zip or .iso files, they can only use the 1Mb bandwidth, if the content is images or html,the speed is no limit",
just out of interest, does anyone know a ssh command(s) to bring up your servers hardware stats? Cpu type and clock speed, memory, disks etc.
I've looked everywhere for a shell command to show cpu type with no luck.
im using vmware in centOS dedicated server
how i can limit Download speed for each IP ?
OR
how i can limit download speed for each Vms?
OR
how i can limit download speed for all Vms?
I have Dedicated Server and create vps via VMWARE
how i can
limit network speed
each virtual machine ?
What's best way to limit upload/download from/to server?
I have found this
[url]
about mod_cband
Is mod_cband best solution ?
This can be done also with mod_bandwith, default enable on whm/cpanel, as write here:
[url]
We have several site that are downloading. how may i limit this site
limit bw,omit speed download,limit connection and ... ecause this sites have very download and ...
my server is centos
Im trying to limit the total amount of bandwidth my server can use, but I am unsure where to start.
Say for example I want to limit the total available upload bandwidth to 100kbit/s.
I've never seen this one before, so I'm hoping I can call upon the collective experience of WHT to solve this one for me.
I have a client who has a .zip file sent to him. When he receives it, it arrives as a .efw file type.
I have a website that just serves small files, under 10kb most of them. I just need a server that lets me ftp the file to it, set up subdomains and domains for one website. Don't need to manage mysql or anything. Not even php. Just serve files.
A good fast OS? Something like lighttpd? Ioono?
I'm currently doing 600gb of bandwidth per month. I'm expecting to do about 1000gb by the end of the year. Would a small server like a pentium 4 be able to handle just serving files?
When i try to install BotNET 1.0 on my dedicated, i got this error :
root@leet [~/botnet/BotNET-1.0]# . install.sh
Compiling source code . . .
In file included from src/main.c:9:
src/../include/bot.h:43: error: array type has incomplete element type
src/../include/bot.h:57: error: array type has incomplete element type
src/../include/bot.h:89: error: array type has incomplete element type
src/main.c: In function:
src/main.c:146: error: type of formal parameter 1 is incomplete
Here is my install.sh file:
Code:
#!/bin/bash
# BotNET installation script.
# If this script causes problems, try "make all" instead.
# Usage: . install.sh
cc="/usr/bin/gcc"
echo "Compiling source code . . ."
bot=`$cc src/main.c src/launch.c src/memo.c src/seen.c src/parse.c src/help.c src/log.c src/info.c -o bin/bot -pthread || (echo 1)`
botnet=`$cc src/botserv.c -o bin/botserv || (echo 1)`
if [ "$bot" != "1" ]; then
echo "Installation complete."
echo "Executables will be found in bin/"
else
echo "Errors encountered during compilation!"
fi
My OS is centOs 5.x
Kernel : Linux 2.6.18-53.el5 #1 SMP Mon Nov 12 02:22:48 EST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
* I have tried all other way to install (make all) and other *
The problem is that HTTP file download speed is nearly 10 times lower than FTP download speed. What could be limiting it? It's about 7Mb for FTP and 70-100Kb for HTTP. Strangely, download speed is OK when browsing from the server itself (e.g. via RDP)
View 2 Replies View Relatedmy server runs centos with whm/cpanel,
some folder may contain over 1000s files,
and the ftp only can show 1000s files well,
where can i large the value and let it show more?
I wanted to add a maximum file size limit of 10mb to all files uploaded via cpanel, php scripts or ftp.
I am currently running cpanel and whm on a linux server.
how i can do this. (i have root access)
I am trying to increase my open file limit on my CentOS release 4.6 VPS.
I have tried modifying my /etc/security/limits.conf with the following:
@mysql soft nofile 4096
@mysql hard nofile 4096
@mysql soft sigpending 4096
@mysql hard sigpending 4096
Even is a mannual set it with "ulimit -n 4096 mysql" it will not stick.
Any ideas what I can do to get this limit increased permanently?
I have a file on my server called admin.php and a folder called "admin" I only want 2 IP addresses to be allowed access to those files.
can this be done in .htaccess? if so can someone give me an example?
I have spent ages trying to work it out myself but I'm a bit of a noob
thanks in advance
what should .htaccess files be chmod'ed to ideally?
I have a big problem concerning the file upload limit (I need a large size, around 2Go) : I was using my app in /var/www/vhost/default and it was working perfectly, I decided to change it and use /var/www/vhost/mydomain.com to have it throught the plesk panel, and there I have an upload limit than I need to push. I can't upload files larger than 128Mo and I don't know why.
- I have checked all php.ini files (with locate php.ini) and they are all correct.
- I used plesk panel to set php conf -> done.
- I put :
php_value memory_limit 2000M
php_value upload_max_filesize 2000M
php_value post_max_size 2000M
in my .htaccess in htdocs
[Code]....
I reload/restart apache2, psa, ... And it still doesn't work, I have no more idea every conf file seems correct. It's not a permission problem because I can upload some 80Mo files but not 500Mo ...
We have found that we need to limit the amount of cpu uage by users on our video share server. On this server we currently have 20 users on a sharred plan. Thought that the obvious BW usage would be the biggest challenge, as it turns out we havent gone over the 2 TB that we have.
We have come up with an encoding process that uses the 264 codec and gives us excellent results in terms of quality but is very cpu intensive to the point of really slowing down the server when 10 or more users simutaneously are encoding their videos.
Can someone suggest a script that would allows us to limit the file size in terms of MB/GB that each user could upload per month.
So for example a client pays 10.00 per month and we wanted to limit their uploads to a total of 900 MB per month vs the client that is paying 50.00 per month who would have the ability to upload say 8 GB per month.
Cento 5
c-panel
Dual Quad Core 2.0 ghz
6Mb Ram
1TB HDD
2 TB of BW
I'm build Plesk Panel for Linux and Presence Builder, I don't want my user can upload their website to hosting via File Manager. How can I do it...
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am having some serious speed issues with my 1Gbit server at FDC. After opening a ticket, they've simply dismissed it as a server configuration problem. However I am convinced it isn't because certain ISP's (usually universities) get good speeds, usually 700kb/sec but the vast majority of my users get between 20-50 kb/sec and it's causing a lot of complaints.
Furthermore I have other servers with FDC which are 100mbit which perform better than my 1 Gbit one. There are no server bottlenecks (CPU/RAM/HDD), since I've closely monitored them (PRTG) and they aren't even heavily utilised. So the problem is with the network at some point.
Speed Test : [url]
where abouts you are downloading from, your ISP and net connection. Wget's from servers are also welcome as are traceroutes.
Say I have 2 websites and they all use file.php which is located on mainserver.com/file.php.
I want to use the file like this:
website1.com/file.php
website2.com/file.php
We are planning on meeting SAS 70 type I compliance this year and likely type II sometime next year.
I was wondering if anyone has any recommendations on who to use for SAS 70 preparation and auditing?
I should mention that we are located in Colorado,
I was stuck in traffic today if there was such a beast as a VPS that runs the latest Mac OS (Leopard or whatever its called!!)
I want to have a windows remote desktop like connection so I see the full desktop.
I have never heard of one, but thought I would ask!
Well the age old question for virtual servers, would you rather a host put all his eggs into one basket "monster node" or several smaller ones. From a provider standpoint one server is easier to manage than several, although if that one goes down, all your customers do with it. Lower costs for the provider, s/he can then pass the savings along.
Example Package:"2GB Ram Packages, 500GB bandwidth, and 20GB space."
The "EXAMPLE" Specs.
All in one
Max Clients: 126
4U Rackmount,
4 Quad Cores, "16 total cores"
256GB DDR2,
8 600GB SAS 10k,
RAID10
Several Server setup:
Max Clients: 14
1U Rackmounts,
Single Quad Core, "4 cores"
32GB DDR2,
2 300GB SAS 10k,
RAID1
If you could tell me why you picked either or.
I need to switch two corporate web sites from a provider which has been providing spotty up time and poor reliability especially on their email servers; worst thing about them is that when they're down we get no notice, until we notice or customers complain. We've had outages for email that lasted as long as 72 hours. I'm not sure how our service is configured there, but I would guess shared hosting.
I understand the differences in shared hosting, virtual private or dedicated server, and dedicated hosting unmanaged or managed. What I'm not sure about is what would be best for our needs. If I dont get other advice, I'll probably sign up for shared hosting with a provider that has other service types available.
We do not do any E-commerce, but our website is our advertising and if we're down we can lose sales. Our customers need access to documentation downloads and get upset if we're down. Our current site has shown these statistics on average per day: 3000-4000 hits, 3000-4000 files 200 visits. Our monthly bandwidth was a maximum of 2GB over the past year. We need less than 50 email addresses.
Phone support is necessary, 24/7 would be nice. We need server monitoring and security, good uptime and reliability statistics or a guarantee. Control panel and statistics would be nice. We dont need any website design tools.
I've used Futurequest for a website in the past but their geared to E-Commerce and have no phone support. I have some websites registered with Dotster but they're very light on support. A colleague has used Lunarpages for similar businesses, I think, and he recommended them. He indicated they were good for him with phone support.
If you're still reading, I'd appreciate any guidance, both for type of service and for specific providers.
I have an IIS 6 website with a strange problem. All content types are sent as text/html. For example, jpegs, gifs, and others all are listed as text/html when I do a header check. Anyone ever seen this or know what might cause it?
View 2 Replies View RelatedSo apparently APC does not make a DC version of their metered switched PDU.
Anyone else have any experience with a PDU of this nature? Just remote on/off is really required and SNMP.
What type of server and connection I need to handle more than 50.000 visits per day in a Webserver Front-End / Database Back-End.
View 5 Replies View RelatedVPS type package ok, need around 30GB HDD space, and maybe 200GB badwith per month, << provide some recommendations >> (dont ask for my budget!). Prefer live chat support 24/7, and need to setup/ transfer site from existing host.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have a client that asked me to educate myself about web hosting and make a recommendation to him about where he should be. He currently has a shared hosting server at Network Solutions and finds unexplained slow downs and disk corruption reports in his forums DB unacceptable.
I'm glad I found this site-lots of good info but nothing like throwing up some stats and seeing what people recommend. The client told me he wanted to move to a dedicated server but I'm thinking a VPS might do the trick. Especially if upgraded with dedicated Core as well as RAM such as wiredtree is offering.
Looking for a managed, Unix based server that in a typical month serves
100k unique visitors
230k page views
500Gb of downloads
But needs to be easily upgradeable to handle his expected traffic levels in the next year of monthly visits in the order of:
250k unique visitors
600k page views
1.1Tb of throughput
As far as features:
*Currently they use about 15 gigs of disk space. Some of that is inefficient disk management but the bulk is them supporting previous software releases.
*needs to be fully managed
*US datacenter with all the features you guys would expect to have as far as backbone access, security, power backups, etc..
*Backups by provider. Let's say 5 gigs worth since the old software versions don't really need to be backed up.(I'll recommend his own backups as well)
*Either plesk or cpanel
*15 minute hardware SLA is what the client is asking for but i'd like to present some comparisons to 1 hour SLA companies to see how much he'd save.
And finally, i tried to search for the answer to this but the keywords kept bringing up lots of hits without good info. The client sells software so the bandwidth needed is pretty consistent until they release a new version. Then it skyrockets to the point they may have 1500 people trying to download a 50Meg file simultaneously. What is the right way to handle that? Use a CDN or negotiate with the hosting provider to provide burstable bandwidth as needed. As a side note while looking at many offerings I was most surprised that bandwidth seems to sold in large chunks with overage costs hidden.