I had a server built and it is now at the data center. It is working great.
I have a Raid 10 question concerning what would happen if one of my hard drives failed.
I have a 3ware 9550SX card. If one of my drives fails and I install a new one with it automatically rebuild on it own?
Someone I know mentioned to me that I need IPMI, KVM override B for it to do this and that I would also have to have software installed fore this to work.
just a 4 drive raid 5 array go down, this is hardware based, controller indicates a 2 drive failure.
It is possible to rebuild this array from the 2 good drives?
Thing is that drives come up fine in test system when testing in spinrite which show no problems, though only 2 show partition structure others just come up as empty!
Quote:
Today we are going to conduct a detailed study of RAIDability of contemporary 400GB hard drives on a new level. We will take two "professional" drives from Seagate and Western Digital and four ordinary "desktop" drives for our investigation. The detailed performance analysis and some useful hints on building RAID arrays are in our new detailed article.
[url]
Is Motherboard RAID as good as a dedicated PCI-E card? I am guessing a dedicated card is the best option, though costs more.
We are looking at buying a barebones server from Supermicro. It features an onboard RAID controller which supports RAID 0, 1, 5 & 10 - but for some strange reason it will only support RAID 5 if you use Windows. Here is a link to the page detailing the RAID features.
[url]
We are going to be running Linux, CentOS 5.1, so we will only have the choice of RAID 0, 1 or 10. This isn't an issue, as having RAID 10 on 4x SAS (15k) drives will be fine for speed and stability. What is an issue is would this RAID controller be as fast or reliable compared to a dedicated PCI-E card? If it can only use RAID 5 in windows, does that suggest this controller is too reliant on software? It would be a nightmare to suffer downtime and data loss because the controller couldn't hack it during a drive failure, or one day it decided to bugger up the array when rebooting.
So that leads me to looking at this card, this looks very good for what we need. Are adaptec a reliable brand? I've seen it advertised for £200, which is a good price.
[url]
This card features RAID 5 and 6, would RAID 6 be better than RAID 10 for redundancy, or is it too slow to bother with? Also it seems to have a battery module available for it, what does this achieve? Cos surely if the power dies the hard drives and motherboard can't run off this little battery, or does it just help the controller stay alive long enough with some hard drive information in its memory if the power goes out during a rebuild?
I could try the Software-RAID 5 of the EQ9 Server of Hetzner.
Does anyone here has experiences, how fast a hardware raid 5 compared against the software-Raid 5 is?
The i7-975 should have enough power to compute the redundnacy on the fly, so there would be a minimal impact on performance. But I have no idea.
I want to run the server under ubuntu 8.04 LTS x64.
On it a vitualisation like VMware the IO-Load could get really high.
So I've just got a server with 2xSATA raid 1 (OS, cpanel and everything in here) and 4xSCSI raid 10 (clean).
Which one do you guys think will give the best performance:
1. Move mysql only to 4xSCSI raid 10
2. Move mysql and home folder to 4xSCSI raid 10
I am in a somewhat complicated situation... I wanted to order a custom server with hardware 3Ware RAID controller but after over a month of waiting I was told the HW RAID controller, as well as any other 3Ware controller they tried, does not work with the motherboard used in the server from Fujitsu-Siemens and that they simply got a reply from FS that the controller is not certified to work with their motherboard.
So although I'd prefer a HW raid, I am forced to either choose a different webhost or setup a software RAID. The problem is, I haven't done that before and am somewhat moderately...scared
I have read a lot of the info about SW RAID on Linux that I could find through Google but there are some questions unanswered still. So I thought that perhaps some of the more knowledgeable WHT members could help me with this problem...
The server specs will be:
Core2Duo E6600 (2.4Ghz), 2GB RAM, 6-8x* 250GB SATA II HDDs, CentOS 4.4 or SuSe, DirectAdmin
* I prefer 8 HDDs (or actually 9) over 6 but I am not sure if their server chassis can hold that many HDDs, I am awaiting answer from them. They don't have any other drives beside the 250GB ones so I am limited to those.
The preferred SW RAID setup is to have everything in RAID 10, except for the /boot partition which has to be on RAID-1 or no RAID I believe, plus one drive as hot spare (that would be the 9th drive). I am quite sure they will not do the setup for me but will give me access to KVM over IP and a Linux image preinstalled on the first HDD so that I'll have a functional system that needs to be upgraded to RAID-10.
How do I do that? The big problem I see is that LILO or GRUB can't boot from a software RAID-5/10 so I will have to mount the /boot partition elsewhere. It's probably terribly simple...if you have done it before which I have not. I have read some articles on how to setup a RAID-5/10 with mdadm (e.g. [url] ) but they usually do not talk about how to setup the boot partition. Should it be setup as a small sized (100-200MB) RAID-1 partition spread over all of the drives in the otherwise RAID-10 array?
What about swap? Should I create a 4-8GB (I plan to upgrade the server RAM to 4GB in near future) RAID-1 swap partition on each of the disks or swap to a file on the main RAID-10 partitions. The second sounds simpler but what about performance? Is swapping to a file on RAID-10 array a bad idea, performance wise?
Is it possible to grow a RAID-10 array in a way similar to growing a RAID-5 array with mdadm (using two extra drives instead of one of course)? mdadm doesn't actually even mention RAID-10 despite it does support it without having to create RAID-0 on top of RAID-1 pairs if the support is in kernel, from what I know.
How often do RAID arrays break? Is it worth having RAID if a servers hard drive goes down? I was thinking it may just be a better option to just have a backup drive mounted to my system and in the even of a system failure just pop in a new hard drive, reload the OS, and then reload all my backups?
View 14 Replies View RelatedI have a new server and it is rather slow during raid 1 recovery after system installed
CPU: Intel Core2Duo E5200 Dual Core, 2.5Ghz, 2MB Cache, 800Mhz FSB
Memory: 4GB DDR RAM
Hard Disk 1: 500GB SATA-2 16MB Cache
Hard Disk 2: 500GB SATA-2 16MB Cache
root@server [~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
256896 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]
2096384 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md2 : active raid1 sdb4[2] sda4[0]
480608448 blocks [2/1] [U_]
[=======>.............] recovery = 36.7% (176477376/480608448) finish=1437.6min speed=3445K/sec
the sync speed is just 3.4Mb/second and the total hours needs to be more than 40 hours
Also the server load is very high (nobody uses it)
root@server [~]# top
top - 07:00:14 up 16:55, 1 user, load average: 1.88, 1.41, 1.34
Tasks: 120 total, 1 running, 119 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 4148632k total, 747768k used, 3400864k free, 17508k buffers
Swap: 5421928k total, 0k used, 5421928k free, 569252k cached
I am in the process of restructuring the infrastructure on our servers. I am thinking of using either RAID 5 (1 hot spare) vs RAID 10 as my 1U server has 4 HDD tray.
RAID 5 would have better capacity but RAID 10 has better overall performance. Which one do you guys go for a shared hosting server?
Is it possible to turn a non raided setup into Linux software raid, while it is live, and if it's the OS drive? Can you even software raid the OS drive remotely? I've been thinking about doing it for the redundancy (and possible slight performance boost for reads, but doing it more for redundancy). I'm using CentOS.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI want to take some data from a raid-disk (taken from a raid-1 sstem). Put it into a new system already, but this system doesn't have any raid.
When viewing "fdisk -l", it said /dev/sdb doesn't contain valid partition. Is there anyway I can mount it now? I am on CentOS 4 box
MY server configure our drives with RAID-1.
How can I check it my server configure with 3ware or software raid ?
Also please advise me how can I monitor raid configuration that my raid is working fine or no ?
I've been talking to the Planet about trading in my four and a half year old "SuperCeleron" (from the old ServerMatrix days) Celeron 2.4 GHz system for something new. As part of their current promotions, I've configured a system that looks decent:
Xeon 3040, 1 gig of RAM, 2x250GB hard disks, RHEL 5, cPanel+Fantastico, and 10 ips for $162.
Not too bad. I could bump up the ram to 2 gb for, I think, $12 more, which I'm thinking about and wouldn't mind some thoughts on. But, the thing that has me really confused is RAID. I like the idea of doing a RAID 1 setup with those two hard disks. But, the Planet wants $40/month for a RAID controller to do it. I really don't want to go over $200 a month!
Any thoughts on alternative redundancy strategies that might avoid that cost? Software RAID does not seem to be offered by the Planet, unless I can figure out how to do it after installation (is that possible?) Better ideas in general on the server?
Just curious what your thoughts are on performance:
2 SCSI Drives 10k w/RAID 1
or
4 SATA 10k w/RAID 10
Prices are not too different with 4 drives just being a tad more.
how well software raid can perform and how it compares to hardware raid. How does software raid actually work and is it worth it?
How should I look at be setting up software raid if I was going to? Would you recommend just to use hardware raid instead?
Which do you guys recommend of the following?
4x 73GB 15,000rpm SAS drives in a RAID 10
or
4x 73GB 15,000rpm SAS drives in a RAID 5 w/ online backup
Are there any significant difference between 4 15K SAS HD in RAID 10 versus 8 7.2K SATAII HD in RAID 10? I have the same question for 2 15K SAS HD in RAID 1 versus 4 7.2K SATAII HD in RAID 10.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI'm currently using 4 x 15K SAS raid 10 for a mysql server for a pretty busy forum, it has no I/O problem.
Now i'm going to migrate to a new server that i'm building soon, I have choice of:
2 x Intel X25-E SSD RAID 1
or
4 x 15K Fujitsu SAS RAID 10
will be using Adaptec 2405 RAID card.
The OS will be installed on a seperate hard drive.
If I go with the SAS setup, will be about $200 cheaper.
Which one do you think is better for Mysql performance?
I have room for 4 more hard drives on my home server. My original goal was to go raid 10 but I've been thinking, raid 5 can support 4 drives and give more capacity. Which one would have better performance as software (md) raid? I'm thinking raid 10 might actually have bad performance as software raid, vs hardware, compared to raid 5. Would raid 5 with 4 drives be better for my case?
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe are looking to build our first server, and collocate it. It will be a higher investment than just renting the server, but will be worth it in the long term, and we have already decided we are going to support the hosting business for a minimum of 3 years - so we might as well invest in a server from the outset to benefit from lower data center charges and higher redundancy and performance.
We are currently looking at Supermicro for servers as they offer 1U barebones systems with dual hotswappable psus and upto 4 hotswappable drives. This would be ideal for redundancy, and also for taking advantage of the speed and redundancy that a RAID 10 array would give you. These two factors combined are very appealing as it would reduce the possibilities of downtime and data loss. Obviously we will be backing up daily, but its good for piece of mind to know that you could potentially blow a PSU and 2 hard drives, and your server will still be up long enough for a data centre technician to replace the parts.
Now then, my business partner and I are currently deciding what the best all round hard drive configuration would be. He has decided that we should opt for SAS instead of SATA to have lower latency seek times, which would give us better performance. I agree, though this does increase costs considerably.
He is then arguing that we use RAID 5 on cost grounds. He says we should only use 3 of the slots to begin with, save money on one drive by not having a spare, and hope we don't have a drive failure - which sods law will happen. I'm not happy us cutting corners to save money, because if we gamble and lose, that's a hell of a mess we have ourselves in, and will cost us a load more time, reputation and data center charges to get ourselves out of it.
I say we might as well go for RAID 10 for that extra performance, and redundancy, you can potentially lose 2 drives so long as they aren't from the same mirrored pair. With RAID 5 you can only lose a drive, it takes longer to rebuild onto a spare, and during rebuild the performance takes a hit. Also RAID 10 is much faster than RAID 5, and at the expense of the cost of a drive.
Now the question we should be asking is... would a SATA2 RAID 10 array provide better performance than a SAS RAID 5 array?
So I think the choice we have to make is either go for RAID 5 and run with a hot spare, and stock a cold spare, or go with RAID 10 and stock 2 cold spares.
We are considering going with Seagate drives because they are high performance and have 5 year warranties. I have had to RMA two Western Digital drives already in the past 12 months, a raptor and a mybook, both deaths invoked data loss.
The server is going to be a linux web, email, dns and mysql box. It will likely feature a single dual/quad core processor, and 4-8GB of unbuffered ddr2 ram.
I'm trying to build a physical raid 0/5 that can plug in to any computer which has SCSI behind it.
What are components you recommend (case, cpu, motherboard, SATA ...)
This is first time raid builder so i don't really need an expensive components.
Question though on RAID choices... I'm considering getting 3 x 250GB SATA drives. Would it be better to make two of them a RAID-1 mirrored pair for my OS, home directories, and use the 3rd drive seperately for backups, swap, and perhaps some logs.... OR should I put all three drives into a RAID-5 set and treat it as a single logical drive?
my math says usable space would actually be identical... with 465GB usable in either setup. RAID-1 would be faster for I/O with no parity overhead... but one drive would not be redundant. On the other hand, RAID-5 would be fully redundant but have parity overhead for writes.
I think I just sold myself on RAID-5, didn't I.
Tried to install xml::rss perl module in whm and go this:
Running make install
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/XML/RSS.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/XML/RSS/Private/Output/Base.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/XML/RSS/Private/Output/V1_0.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/XML/RSS/Private/Output/V2_0.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/XML/RSS/Private/Output/V0_91.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/XML/RSS/Private/Output/V0_9.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/XML/RSS/Private/Output/Roles/ModulesElems.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/XML/RSS/Private/Output/Roles/ImageDims.pm
Installing /usr/share/man/man3/XML::RSS.3pm
Writing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/XML/RSS/.packlist
Appending installation info to /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod
/usr/bin/make install UNINST=1 -- OK
cPCPAN: Module (File::Spec) holdback (3.2701 held back to 3.25)
perlmod--Install done
Why is it installing to perl 5.8.5 when my perl version is 5.8.8?
root@server [~]# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for i686-linux
I was hosted with these guys for well over 2 years, and was spending on average more than $2,000.00 a month for servers.
I had slowly grown to well over 10 boxes, and was definately on my way. then one day I get a spam complaint that one of my serves was casing complaints. So I checked it out, and asked for the complaints to be relayed so I would have record of it..... nothing.... I responded and even tried to call, but at that point they had sent me a tciket stating.
We have recieved well ofer 1000 spam complaints from a server you lease with us, per out TOS we are terminating ALL OF YOUR SERVERS, and you have 15 days to remove the data!
WOW... there was no ability to have them terminate that server, they simply said NO your account will be terminated (all of your servers) and you will be banned from The Planet!
When I tried to call they said your not allowed to speak with the abuse dept, again I tried contacting my account manager, and he said he checked into it and only saw a few complaints, and didn;t understand why they were doing this... In short I barely got moved over to another provideer before they shut me down completely..... They did however offer one course of action... you could turn your dedicated server clients over to us so they dont have to move! THEY ACTUALLY SAID THIS!
I at that point made the move and then they hit my credit card for another month well short of 20 days before a bill would even be due.. I had to file charges at the local courthouse to get this reversed.
My advice, if you host at the planet dont send mail. get another server provider for mail, these guys are *&^)(* and they don;t care about shutting you down no matter what you spend with them, on top of that they will try to scarf your clients up if they can, after they leave you high and dry....
Anyone else have issues like this with anyone else. I want to compile a list of providers that do business like this so I can avoid them.
Probably nothing new. Seriously, they're horrible and everyone here probably knows it. But... I'm ticked, so I'll add something extra to show how genius they are.
The problem is I can't seem to reach my website on godaddy. It appears as if the server is down. Both via the browser and ftp it fails.
Anyway, I could write a review but no need... I'll let the e-mail I sent them and their responses do the talking.
Okay, thanks for the information... I'm still humored that needing my pin is
actual security considering it's listed on your website after I login. My
password is way better security because it's never visible anywhere...
anyway... based on the information you gave me here's what I have found out..
The first instance of me not being able to reach the website was around noon
EST yesterday. Earlier that morning I was on the website and had logged in
via FTP. After noon the website was no longer reachable. This is a test from
one computer.
Around 6PM on a different network, the website was reachable from 3
different computers, including the one it wasn't reachable from earlier that
day. About 30 minutes later the website became unreachable again. Attempts
to reach it from all 3 machines failed.
This morning, I considered your response email and assuming the webserver is
up like you stated, I decided to try another network. The website was up on
that network. However, it is still down on the other two networks. It seems
that the website works for a limited time on each network before something
happens to keep the network from reaching the webserver.
Attempts at pinging the webserver all fail.
Doing a tracert to 2leet.com times out at the following: ....
so my server dies every day and requires human intervention to fully restart all service to have my site work properly. i suspect sigterm issues as it fails to restart all service as website is still down so i always have to reboot it.
Tried recompile apache with no success
[Tue Mar 18 06:51:27 2008] [error] [client 203.160.1.39] request failed: erroneous characters after protocol string: If-Modified-Since: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:16:52 GMT
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (7465) in scoreboard slot 16
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (27848) in scoreboard slot 17
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (27434) in scoreboard slot 18
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (30782) in scoreboard slot 19
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (7465) in scoreboard slot 16
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (27848) in scoreboard slot 17
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (27434) in scoreboard slot 18
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (30782) in scoreboard slot 19
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (7465) in scoreboard slot 16
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (27848) in scoreboard slot 17
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (27434) in scoreboard slot 18
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [error] Bad pid (30782) in scoreboard slot 19
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:18 2008] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:20 2008] [notice] mod_security/1.9.5 configured - Apache/1.3.39 (Unix) PHP/5.2.5
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:20 2008] [notice] Any You Like mod_ssl/2.8.30 OpenSSL/0.9.8g mod_perl/1.29 FrontPage/5.0.2.2510 configured -- resuming normal operations
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:20 2008] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec)
[Tue Mar 18 10:03:20 2008] [notice] Accept mutex: sysvsem (Default: sysvsem)
when using outlook, things are fine but mail() in php is acting up. I ran a dns report and here is what it said. could this be the problem? what should i do?
Domain mydomain.com has 2 mail-servers.
Checking mail server (PRI=10) mail.mydomain.com [208.70.160.19]
Mail server mail.mydomain.com[208.70.160.19] answers on port 25
<<< 220 mail.hsservers.com ESMTP
>>> HELO www.checkdns.net
<<< 250 mail.hsservers.com
>>> MAIL FROM: <dnscheck@uniplace.com>
<<< 250 ok
>>> RCPT TO: <postmaster@mydomain.com>
<<< 451 temporary failure (#4.3.0)
>>> RCPT TO: <root@mydomain.com>
<<< 451 temporary failure (#4.3.0)
>>> RCPT TO: <info@mydomain.com>
<<< 451 temporary failure (#4.3.0)
>>> RCPT TO: <webmaster@mydomain.com>
<<< 451 temporary failure (#4.3.0)
Probably mail server does not accept mail for mydomain.com (received status 451)
Checking mail server (PRI=30) mail2.mydomain.com [208.70.160.20]
Mail server mail2.mydomain.com[208.70.160.20] answers on port 25
<<< 220 mail2.hsservers.com ESMTP
>>> HELO www.checkdns.net
<<< 250 mail2.hsservers.com
>>> MAIL FROM: <dnscheck@uniplace.com>
<<< 250 ok
>>> RCPT TO: <postmaster@mydomain.com>
<<< 451 temporary failure (#4.3.0)
>>> RCPT TO: <root@mydomain.com>
<<< 451 temporary failure (#4.3.0)
>>> RCPT TO: <info@mydomain.com>
<<< 451 temporary failure (#4.3.0)
>>> RCPT TO: <webmaster@mydomain.com>
<<< 451 temporary failure (#4.3.0)
Probably mail server does not accept mail for mydomain.com (received status 451)
Some of your MX do not work properly
I have had sporadic mysql failures. Cpanel/WHM successfully restarts it and I am notified via e-mail and text message, but I have yet to be able to determine what is causing the failure. From what I can tell nothing is logged ether by cpanal, mysql or the system about the failure.
My questions is can cpanel or mysql be configured to log what the issue is?
I have the max connections for mysql and apached limited to match the servers capacity.
first we have, uname -a
Code:
Linux nsa.nullbytehosting.com 2.6.9-55.plus.c4 #1 Sun May 20 10:11:05 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
this is centos4.5 I believe.
and I have 5 ip addresses.
208.110.67.101 at eth0:0
208.110.67.114 at eth0:1
208.110.67.115 at eth0:2
208.110.67.116 at eth0:3
208.110.67.117 at eth0:4
my problem.
I cannot seem to get my dns working properly.
I am pointing my domain of nullbytehosting.com to ns1.nullbytehosting.com and ns2.nullbytehosting.com and of course , iuse godaddy, and ive configured that part properly.
Ive recently stopped using any control panel software, and started using ssh only.
I can access ns1 and ns2 . nullbytehosting.com just fine.
www. or just plain old nullbytehosting.com and its a no go.
allow me to show you my files.
/etc/resolv.conf
Code:
search nullbytehosting.com
nameserver 208.110.67.101
nameserver 208.110.67.114
/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf
Code:
//
// named.conf for Red Hat caching-nameserver
//
include "/etc/rndc.key";
controls {
inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { "rndckey"; };
};
options {
directory "/var/named";
dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db";
statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt";
recursion no;
/*
* If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want
* to talk to, you might need to uncomment the query-source
* directive below. Previous versions of BIND always asked
* questions using port 53, but BIND 8.1 uses an unprivileged
* port by default.
*/
query-source address * port 53;
multiple-cnames yes;
fetch-glue yes;
};
//
// a caching only nameserver config
//
controls {
inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { rndckey; };
};
zone "." IN {
type hint;
file "/var/named/named.ca";
};
zone "localdomain" IN {
type master;
file "/var/named/localdomain.zone";
allow-update { none; };
};
zone "localhost" IN {
type master;
file "/var/named/localhost.zone";
allow-update { none; };
};
zone "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" IN {
type master;
file "/var/named/named.local";
allow-update { none; };
};
zone "0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa" IN {
type master;
file "/var/named/named.ip6.local";
allow-update { none; };
};
zone "255.in-addr.arpa" IN {
type master;
file "/var/named/named.broadcast";
allow-update { none; };
};
zone "0.in-addr.arpa" IN {
type master;
file "/var/named/named.zero";
allow-update { none; };
};
zone "nsa.nullbytehosting.com" {
type master;
file "/var/named/nsa.nullbytehosting.com.db";
};
zone "nullbytehosting.com" {
type master;
file "/var/named/nullbytehosting.com.db";
};
zone "enigmagroup.org" {
type master;
file "/var/named/enigmagroup.org.db";
};
zone "2020code.com" {
type master;
file "/var/named/2020code.com.db";
};
zone "megansblog.info" {
type master;
file "/var/named/megansblog.info.db";
};
logging {
};
view test {
};
/var/named/nsa.nullbytehosting.com.db
Code:
$TTL 14400
@ 86400 IN SOA ns1.nullbytehosting.com. nullbytehosting.gmail.com. (
2007031502
86400
7200
3600000
86400
)
ns1.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN A 208.110.67.101
ns2.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN A 208.110.67.114
mail.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN A 208.110.67.101
nsa.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN A 208.110.67.101
ftp.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN A 208.110.67.101
www.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN CNAME nullbytehosting.com.
test.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN CNAME nullbytehosting.com.
nsa.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN MX 0 mail.nullbytehosting.com.
nsa.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN NS ns1.nullbytehosting.com.
nsa.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN NS ns2.nullbytehosting.com.
nsa.nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN A 208.110.67.101
/var/named/nullbytehosting.com.db
Code:
$TTL 14400 nullbytehosting.com 14440 IN SOA ns1.nullbytehosting.com. psychomarine.gmail.com. (
2007031601
86400
7200
3600000
86400
)
ns1 14400 IN A 208.110.67.101
ns2 14400 IN A 208.110.67.114
mail 14400 IN A 208.110.67.101
ftp 14400 IN A 208.110.67.101
www 14400 IN CNAME nullbytehosting.com.
nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN MX 0 mail.nullbytehosting.com.
nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN NS ns1.nullbytehosting.com.
nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN NS ns2.nullbytehosting.com.
nullbytehosting.com. 14400 IN A 208.110.67.101
/var/named/named.local
Code:
$TTL 86400
@ IN SOA localhost. root.localhost. (
1997022700 ; Serial
28800 ; Refresh
14400 ; Retry
3600000 ; Expire
86400 ) ; Minimum
IN NS localhost.
1 IN PTR localhost.
/var/named/named.zero
Code:
$TTL 86400
@ IN SOA localhost root (
42 ; serial (d. adams)
3H ; refresh
15M ; retry
1W ; expiry
1D ) ; minimum
IN NS localhost
/var/named/localdomain.zone
Code:
$TTL 86400
@ IN SOA localhost root (
42 ; serial (d. adams)
5M ; refresh
5M ; retry
1W ; expiry
1D ) ; minimum
IN NS localhost
localhost IN A 127.0.0.1
/var/named/named.broadcast
Code:
$TTL 86400
@ IN SOA localhost root (
42 ; serial (d. adams)
3H ; refresh
15M ; retry
1W ; expiry
1D ) ; minimum
IN NS localhost
and finally, here is a list of the files in the /var/named directory.
Code:
/slaves
/chroot
/data
named.broadcast
named.zero
localdomain.zone
named.ca
localhost.zone
named.ip6.local
named.local
nsa.nullbytehosting.com.db
nullbytehosting.com.db
can someone please inform me of why this isnt allowing me to see nullbytehosting.com www.nullbytehosting.com or any sites I point to ns1.nullbytehosting.com or ns2.nullbytehosting.com
clearly accessing
ns1.nullbytehosting.com
ns2.nullbytehosting.com
shows the default page I intend to see, however
nullbytehosting.com
www.nullbytehosting.com
or anyhting like that doesnt exist.
A lookup on the dns tools website, shows alot of errors , that google isnt much help with. everyone has their own way, and none seem to put it all together and work properly.
How long it takes to rebuild RAID5 if one of failed disks was replaced? How long it takes to assume full performance again?
Our support changed disk in our server 2h ago, but it's still extremely slow