NetDirekt.DE Comments
Mar 25, 2007Netdirekt.de seems to have very nice plans for dedicated servers, especially for hosting binary content.
How would you rate their network and their service? Do they provide support in English?
ADVERTISEMENT
Netdirekt - Bad
Jul 20, 2008Have Paid the server beside this offices, after payment ceased to answer all questions connected with installing the server. But then gave the answers to the other questions. Passed already more time chosen on installation. Paid through paypal. As possible return their own money if server we have not got and presently he already does not need?
View 0 Replies View RelatedNetDirekt
Jan 2, 2007If there is any co-location in NetDirekt (de).
Becuase i im going to start my own server company which will be based in (de)
However i im going to need rack/cage for the meanwhile.
I don't see any offers about cages or rack's in netdirekt site?
Maybe should i e-mail them.
NetDirekt.de Datacenter
May 15, 2008I read a lot of positive comments about Netdirekt.de, his service, his professional and fast support, etc. but I was unable to find informations and (better) some pictures of their datacenter.
Their website come from web 0.1 (alpha) era and there are not information about this. So, if someone has more informations, I kindly ask:
Do you know some more details about datacenter structure, power redundancy, ups and, moreover, diesel generators?
Do you have some picture of this datacenter?
Any Netdirekt.de Customers Around
Apr 12, 2007I'm a client of netdirekt.de starting from today. I want to move my old sites from EV1 to Netdirekt.de but unfortunately , they didn't gave me the dns servers. I've already set-up the domains from Plesk CP , but I don't know the name servers.
View 1 Replies View RelatedNetdirekt And VPSs
Apr 22, 2007I would to know if you know someone sells VPS on Netdirekt servers, cause I don't like very much the official NetDirekt VPS offers...
View 5 Replies View Related1+ Year Review - Netdirekt
Oct 7, 2009I will try to share my experience with all of you regarding the company I rent my dedicated servers - Netdirekt.
I found out about them over an year ago when I needed to move to dedicated server. I decided to give them a try, since I was new in this area and since I am perfectionist in this job (making backup of backups of backups)I thought I don't have what to loose if they disappoint me. At least not much.
So over an year ago, I ordered my first server with them. It was Core2Duo server with 4GB of RAM, with a nice price. By the way, when I saw their 1996 website and their pricing, I was getting ready to get disappointed)
I didn't need much help in the beginning, the hardware and network were (are) top notch. Some months later, 4 if I remember correctly, I expanded my business and ordered a second server with them. So, I am really satisfied with their service.
Couple of experiences I got with them that I would like to share with you.
Once, the hard drive of one of my servers started fiving SMART errors so it needed to be changed. It was Sunday, 1AM, so I didn't expect much and it was the secondary (backup) drive so it wasn't THAT urgent to me. Anyway, I dropped them an e-mail requesting drive change. 15 minutes (yup, 15 minutes, Sunday, 1AM) later I got an e-mail back, their representative asking me am I ready for the hard drive replacement. I replied yes. I told him i shut off the server. 10 minutes later my server was back online, with new drive in it.
Later on, once they had 2 hours network outage and another time 1 hour power outage I think, that is in an year. My servers are checked by Pingdom so I believe their uptime.
Then I left them alone for some months, didn't bother them since I had no issues at all, until 2 weeks ago when I got my third server with them. I believe I have been the most boring client ever to them. 10 times maybe I asked IP transfer from one server to another, and they did that very fast and without making me feel uncomfortable by asking that from them over and over again.
So overall, I am very satisfied with their service. They don't do much (hardware and network only, no management), but I think they are perfect in what they do.
Keep up the great work netdirekt, and you will keep me with you forever.
RockMyWeb Comments
Jul 18, 2007I've been with RockMyWeb.net for exactly one month now, and I want to share my experiences. This is a one-month experience, so it will be mainly about new purchase and initial support. This is a quite long post, I wasn't really considering to write that long.
I'm a shared hosting provider in local language. One of the websites I host has grown too much to be on a shared server. It didn't even fit on a standart VPS with 256 MB guaranteed, 1 GB burst ram. So we decided to go with VirtuallyDedicated,
[url]
with the plan 1.5 GHP, since it was better than a dedicated server with pentium-4 processor and 1 Gb ram, and was cheaper. The website being hosted is www.trforumcu.com, along with a dozen of small websites.
Purchase:
I requested a custom quote, with cPanel and management, less diskspace. They prepared the quote within 3 hours, I paid within 24 hours, they set up the VPS within 12 hours, including initial management. The process was painless.
Initial support:
We had some requests about the VPS within the first 3 days, before moving the websites. The tickets was being responded within 2 minutes, some being even within the same minute. That is the fastest response time I've ever got from a provider (I've been with 6 different VPS providers, as far as I remember.) It looks like someone is always waiting for tickets at any time. My tickets were usually being opened in their nights, due to the time zone difference between us. I'm very satisfied with their knowledgeable support.
One point about their support is that they act as if the customer is their friend. I mean, They don't send this reply:
Quote:
Hello,
The issue is being worked on.
Best Regards,
Blah Blah
Customer Service Represantative
RockMyWeb.net
Instead, they send this within the minute:
Quote:
Hi, I'm having a look at it right away.
I, myself, actually use the former type of reply to my own customers. But the latter was quite nice, considering they are sending it right away, and start working on the actual problem within the minute. And they are solving the problem, too.
Support within the month:
After initial configurations, we had some problems. Our website was using too much resources, and the server needed to be optimized a little bit. I opened a ticket. They replied 4 times, without my reply. They informed me about the process well. After 4 replies, they said the server should be fine now.
After 2 days, they sent me an email, asking if I'm satisfied with the optimization. This is the first time I'm getting an email from a provider after some time, asking about my satisfaction.
We also had a cPanel licence issue (cPanel suddenly forgot about its licence, and started saying "cannot read licence file"). This was solved within 36 hours. They said the problem needs to be fixed by cPanel support staff itself, and their support over weekend is not the best. They kept updating me every 12 hours, saying they are waiting the cPanel staff. After 36 hours, the issue was fixed.
About their system:
Their VPS technology is different from my other VPSs with other providers. They don't use Virtuozzo, they use some kind of custom system (it doesn't seem to be VMware or like). This is the only thing I can complain, I was used to VZ and their custom panel is quite different. They provide VPS restart utility, and this is actually the only thing I need from a VPS remote panel.
They don't provide equal-share CPU, they allocate guaranteed CPU. This was very important for us, because the website we were hosting was being kicked off the VPS providers due to high CPU usage. With rockmyweb's allocated CPU, we are not interfering with other VPSs on the system, and we feel quite more comfortable. Also, we have 1.5 processor cores guaranteed, much higher than any other VPS providers will provide for this cost.
Their backup system is also satisfying. They charge 0.25 per GB backup used, not allocated. So I don't pay for unused backup space.
Overall, I'm satisfied with their service, and very happy with their support over the first month. I'll update this topic with additional information and comments (both positive and negative) over the time.
Mainboard Comments
Apr 13, 2007[url]
has anyone tried to put this board into 1u case? seem like a sweet deal
Review/comments About QuillHost?
May 2, 2009Does anyone have a review/comments about QuillHost?
Also, does anyone know a good, reputable host with packages similar in price to QuillHost (or better than QuillHost)?
A2b2.com :: Reviews Or Comments?
Jun 8, 2008Any one use a2b2.com, any reviews or comments?
View 8 Replies View RelatedAny Comments About Sago Networks
Apr 9, 2008With the dedicatedplace.com ongoing saga, I'm looking for a new dedicated server. I'm considering Sago Networks [url] Anyone have any experience with them?
View 14 Replies View RelatedWatchguard Firewall Comments
Mar 11, 2008Anyone using a Watchguard firewall X750e or other in a past or current setup which can provide me with some feedback on their experience?
I am looking at introducing a Firebox running Fireware 10.
Ironport Appliances - Asking For Comments
Nov 7, 2007I am interested to setup two Ironport appliances in my company network. As the current company is about 120 users, and each user send and receive an average of 100 email per day (including newsletter, signup, etc) it’s about 12000 email a day.
I am interested in :
For the mail side of the company, I am thinking about an Ironport C150 and for web filtering, I am thinking about S350. The current company outgoing banwidth is 60 Mbit/s at peaks, but I want to be able to be able to continue to use it with traffic up to 200 Mbit/s, as we will maybe take some server in the company network in a few months.
Some questions :
- Is it really « setup and forget » appliances (except monitoring them)?
- Are they hard to setup and configure?
- Do they support many email languages?
- What is the price for both appliance, like around 5k each, 10k each?
Addressing Matt's [comments] Against Xen
Jun 3, 2007I would like properly address Matt Ayer's (WiseOne) continual claims that user created swap in xen can lead to disastrous situations. This doesn't make any sense from a Kernel point of view. Linux kernel treats Swap not as a additional memory, but as auxiliary storage, and will use it only sparingly. So a larger than ordinary swap has effectively zero impact on performance.
Quote:
I just don't have the time. Try this quick though. Create as many 64MB RAM Xen VPS's as you can, make a 1GB swap file inside each VPS, run a memory hogger, and then finally watch your system die due to horrific disk I/O. Not fun, I'll tell you that.
Conclusion: User controlled swap in a shared environment is a very, very, very bad thing.
Now let us assume there is a hostile user who is egregiously bent on creating excess disk I/O for the host and has purposefully hired vps to enact his revenge on the provider. Further assume that, for this nefarious purpose he has taken a 64MB xen and is running a full 1GB real memory allocated workload (To get create such a load itself would be difficult unless he writes his own programs to do this). Now note that, for the offending vps, the impact of the disk I/O is at the memory level, while the impact on the host is at the disk level. So very trivially, the vps would be so crippled to make it pretty much useless much before this starts having significant effect on the main server. And if engendering excess disk I/O is the sole purpose of user, then all he need to do is write a program to consecutively load and free all the files in the entire harddisk. This will create worse disk I/O than the convoluted method of using large swap. And the latter can be done on both virtuozzo and Xen--though I think in recent versions both have methods to throttle disk I/O.
The problem that UnixShell ran into with Xen was owing to their use of Snapshot, which is something that's prohibited, unless of course, you are running on a desktop with a single virtual machine. LVM snapshot will exactly double the disk I/O. The real problem that the usage is insidious and will not affect the actual vps that's leading to the excess load, but will affect the entire server as a whole.
Xen does have some drawbacks, but it can have all the important features which most providers here think are unique to virtuozzo.
Comments About Cloudmark Authority For Spamassassin?
Dec 21, 2007Is someone using Cloudmark Authority for Spamassassin?
http://www.cloudmark.com/serviceprov.../spamassassin/
If yes, what are your comments and what do you pay for this service?
New To Colo, Would Like Comments About Hot Swap, Redundancy, And Bandwidth
Feb 4, 2008Considering skipping VPS and going to a colo setup for a handful of sites. Nothing major, so the server will be very entry level, but with redundancy in mind (software RAID1 and 2 nics). But I have a few basic questions:
How good is hot swapping in Linux? This was very hard to me to find out online. I am getting a 1U rack with a hot swap backplane and 2 SATA drives. I won't be using any commercial software with my setup.
How does redundant NIC work? This is new to me and am wondering how this is setup.
I think I can shop around NYC for a 1U slot for around $40 a month. I don't need a lot of transfer, but would like a decent pipe. The thought of 1Mbit sounds unattractive (transfer is around 100KBytes/s, right?). How much would 10Mbit cost? I found some quotes but they seem way too much (I could be wrong).