i have xampp i followed this redivide.com/blog/setting-up-a-name-based-virtual-host-vhost/
when im on the computer that xampp runs on it works fine both domains go to their proper directory ones c://xampp/htdocs/fa and the others c://xampp/htdocs/wsd but when i try it on another computer both domains go to the default folder which is c://xampp/htdocs
i have xampp i followed this redivide.com/blog/setting-up-a-name-based-virtual-host-vhost/
when im on the computer that xampp runs on it works fine both domains go to their proper directory ones c://xampp/htdocs/fa and the others c://xampp/htdocs/wsd but when i try it on another computer both domains go to the default folder which is c://xampp/htdocs
I have a task of converting a current Win Server based apache server from multiple IP based virtual hosts to a full name based virtual hosting.I'm famiilar with the steps but I was wondering if there are any gotchas in Windows that I should be aware of. It seems that now matter what I change in the new config it doesn't work or work as expected.
I'm aware that millions of websites using shared hosting are configured with name based virtual hosting.
I'm just wondering now how name based vhosts could be a disadvantage for hosting our websites?
Currently we have a static IP address for each website, apache configured with vhosts for each of these IP Addresses.
I was thinking about re-configuring to name based vhosts, use up less IP Addresses and only have one or two for domains to point to per server.
Is there anything I should know about name based vhosts?
Currently I know of the following issues:
- I can't setup SSL (I don't think?) without a unique IP, but this doesn't matter to me.
- Apache may be making DNS lookups?
This post may seem a bit silly overall, I doubt there is anything important to note about name based vhosts, but just wanted to know if anyone knew something I should know.
Our current ip based vhost setup works, but it would be nice to drop usage on all of those IP Addresses and we have no need for IP address access from browsers and whatnot.
I am looking for Xen VPS servers hosted High end equipment
Ie RAID 10 / SAN with good support willing to pay upto 70 USD per month.
I don't need them to be managed, just very reliable with excellent and reactive support. I have looked on the forums and cannot find any that suit my needs.
As far as I can tell, SSL is working perfectly on my server. Though I am wondering why I am getting errors logged? By the looks of it, I've been getting them every day since I opened my server.
Here's a few: [30/Jun/2008 04:30:46 04877] [warn] Init: (host.mywebsite.com:443) You configured HTTP(80) on the standard HTTPS(443) po$ [30/Jun/2008 04:30:46 04877] [warn] Init: SSL server IP/port conflict: mywebsite.com:443 (/usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.c$ [30/Jun/2008 04:30:46 04877] [warn] Init: You should not use name-based virtual hosts in conjunction with SSL!! [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: (host.mywebsite.com:443) RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicCons$ [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: (mywebsite.com:443) RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `www.mywebsite.c$ [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: (host.mywebsite.com:443) You configured HTTP(80) on the standard HTTPS(443) po$ [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: SSL server IP/port conflict: mywebsite.com:443 (/usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.c$ [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: You should not use name-based virtual hosts in conjunction with SSL!
I have set up IP-Based Virtual Hosts, as I have been requested to set it up for SSL.
I have successfully set up all redirects and routes using the IFCONFIG and ROUTE.
My query is this, I have noticed that each HTTP request actually has to come in through the Virtual IP address (which is assigned to each site) from outside. Else it just displays the default host. Does this mean I have to have a separate phone line and router for each web-site I wish to host?
I've started looking into KVM to possibly to run alongside or even to end up replacing our current Xen infrastructure. The fact that it's built into the mainstream linux kernel is very appealing.
Are there any Control panels/basic frontends for this at the moment to allow users to Reboot/Reimage their VM's? At the moment its looking as though we would need something inhouse or custom developed
have a number of vps servers with USA based VPS hosts, very happy with these companies but as they are USA based load time could be improved with AU based server. Also search engine considerations as well fictate we need to offer AU based hsoting. So now looking to setup future accounts a little closer to home with australian based vps hosting
Does anyone know of a really good, fast, reliable affordable vps host offering cpanel/whm vps hosting in a top notch australian data centre.
hoping to pay arounf $100 per month, with room to grow when we have more clients on the server...
This is the average package we are on with us based hosts so looking for something as close as possible to this...
$89 Monthly $0 Setup 2 GB Burst RAM 512 MB Guaranteed RAM 20 GB Storage 500 GB Monthly Transfer 4 IP Addresses Unlimited Domains Unlimited User Accounts Cpanel/WHM
Minimum Server Specs Dual Xeon 3 GHz or Better 8 GB Registered ECC RAM U320 SCSI HD in Hardware RAID 10 Zero Downtime During Drive Failure Hot-Swap Drives and Fans Replaceable on the Fly Dual Gigabit Network Interfaces
If anyone can point me in the direction of some reputable companies id be very happy!
Yes i have searched the forum but cant really find mention of good australian based vps hosts.
I see some errors about lame servers in messages log,and i noticed that look like adress of isp surfer domain beacuse i noticed domain of my isp listed also as lame name server.Here is example:
Nov 24 03:46:55 available9 named[7562]: lame server resolving '247.100.51.72.in-addr.arpa' (in '100.51.72.in-addr.arpa'?): 205.214.192.202#53 Nov 24 03:46:55 available9 named[7562]: lame server resolving '247.100.51.72.in-addr.arpa' (in '100.51.72.in-addr.arpa'?): 205.214.192.201#53 Nov 24 03:46:56 available9 named[7562]: lame server resolving '247.100.51.72.in-addr.arpa' (in '100.51.72.in-addr.arpa'?): 205.214.192.202#53 Nov 24 03:46:56 available9 named[7562]: lame server resolving '247.100.51.72.in-addr.arpa' (in '100.51.72.in-addr.arpa'?): 205.214.192.201#53 Nov 24 07:19:51 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'ducksimilar.com/NS/IN': 203.93.208.87#53 Nov 24 07:19:51 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'ducksimilar.com/NS/IN': 91.208.228.150#53 Nov 24 07:19:52 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'host1.experienceexcept.com/AAAA/IN': 203.93.208.87#53 Nov 24 07:19:52 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'host2.experienceexcept.com/AAAA/IN': 203.93.208.87#53 Nov 24 07:19:52 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'host1.experienceexcept.com/AAAA/IN': 91.208.228.150#53 Nov 24 07:19:52 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'host2.experienceexcept.com/AAAA/IN': 91.208.228.150#53 Nov 24 07:19:52 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'host1.experienceexcept.com/AAAA/IN': 203.93.208.87#53 Nov 24 07:19:52 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'host2.experienceexcept.com/AAAA/IN': 203.93.208.87#53 Nov 24 07:19:52 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'host1.experienceexcept.com/AAAA/IN': 91.208.228.150#53 Nov 24 07:19:52 available9 named[7562]: FORMERR resolving 'host2.experienceexcept.com/AAAA/IN': 91.208.228.150#53
i have adidcated server any i get anew one and my site is rock2host.com on the domain name i make the ns1 - ns2-ns3-ns4 of ips of the new server but the problem that to this time there is no any account on my server is working as i have adns error but i do not what is the problem i made that
DNS Functions Adding an A entry for your hostname Bind reloading on server using rndc zone: [rock2host.com] Error reloading bind on server: rndc: get config key list: not found
DNS Functions Cleanup Nameserver Config File Fatal! named.conf fails named-checkconf, please repair named.conf and try again
I am currently facing a move from my existing web host, as they are altogether incompetent. Four of the last five days, my site has either been down, showing a suspended page, or redirecting to the main page of the host. (I am a legitimate business - not selling penis enlargement supplements)
So now, I need a good host, who will provide maximum value for dollar spent. My requirements are fairly simple. I need 5 SQL databases, the ability to install and configure a CMS of my choosing, and a site that is based in the US. (I need my site to be US based and listed, for very specific reasons)
I have used Rochen in the past, and am very happy with them. However, I want my sites on a different host, as several of my other sites are cross linked.
Finding services in such a competitive field is overwhelming. It's getting too hard to cut through the BS.
When you set up a new domain you have to write a new virtual host to httpd.conf... then you have to restart the Apache... Is their a way to do this without the restart. Surely a big ISP doesn't restart Apache every time a new domain is added.
We have an in house centOS linux developer box running apache 2.x
We have our own on-site router/switch setup etc.
We host our external website whatever.com with Networksolutions
On our whatever.com DNS (via network solutions). We have our domain subscriber.whatever.com pointing to our external IP address. subscriber.whatever.com -> xx.xx.xx.xx
In our router configuration we have subscriber.whatever.com forwarding to our CentOS linux development box. it's forwarding to the internal network IP address 10.xx.xx.xx
However we want the box to redirect someone when they come in on subscriber.whatever.com... We basically want it to redirect them to subscriber.whatever.com:port/folder/
Preferably masked so that all someone would see is subscriber.whatever.com but they're actually at subscriber.whatever.com:port/folder/
Unfortunately network solutions's setup won't allow us to easily do this so we have to do it somehow locally.
Anyone have any suggestions? I've got this working on the box itself (if you goto the site on the box via gnome) however externally or on another system on our internal network it's a no go.
For some reason, the first virtual host i have listed in apache2.conf gets all the traffic of all the other virtual hosts listed below it.
Example: Domain xyz.com is listed as the first virtual host. the second, third, and fourth are 123.com, 987.com, and mno.com, respectively (fictitious domains). However, it seems that everything below xyz.com goes straight to xyz.com.
If i switch the first entry, xyz.com with any of the others, such as mno.com, so that mno.com is the first virtual host entry, everything then forwards to that domain.
I've downloaded and installed the Microsoft Virtual PC image for testing IE6. The development copy of my website is on the host PC, running on Windows XP/Apache/PHP. I need to use IE6 on the virtual PC to view pages served up by Apache on the host PC.
I know this requires networking them together, but I've no idea how to do that. I've installed the Microsoft Loopback Adapter on the host PC, and told the virtual PC it can use that adapter in the Virtual PC settings dialogue, but on the host PC the loopback adapter says "limited or no connectivity".
(Before someone suggests it, I've been using MultipleIEs. Trouble is, you can't test printing with that - you need a proper copy of IE6.)
I've run into a wall trying to run apache with multiple websites allowing users to use FTPd to manage files.
I'm running FreeBSD 7.1 on Apache 2.2.x
The issue is that Apache runs as www:www but FTPd writes the files as username:client. When performing some scripts that edit back-end files, this obviously can cause errors.
The data for each directory is stored in /home/username/www
I looked into some apache directives I could use. I tried putting User and Group directives into the vhost configuration for each vhost, but that did not work. I even found the perchild module and it looked like it can do the job but was a bit scared and turned off by the fact that it states it is beta at the top of the page. (I cannot link to it because I do not have enough posts.)
In the proxmox site they say that they have tested and validated virtual appliances for major virtualization technologies (VMWare, OpenVZ and Virtuozzo).
However I contacted two VPS providers and both said they cannot host this due to custom kernel of this product.
I wish to know are there any other hosts who can host this in a VPS.
My requirements are like 300GB disk space and 800G of monthly bandwidth (prefer a guaranteed core).
I have a virtual host and I want to allow .htaccess files to be used, but that requires to put allow override yes in the virtual host declairation as its off by default, but I get this error:
Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 16 of /etc/httpd/conf/virtualhosts.conf: AllowOverride not allowed here
This completly ditches my whole virtual hosting idea that I've been planing for a while.
Any other way to allow .htaccess through virtual hosts?
what hosts are considered the best for virtual dedicated servers.
I know about the big names like GoDaddy and Yahoo, but who really has the best service and (importantly) the best price/value?
Heres what I need power-wise: Something that offers 2GB+ of RAM to me, 20GB+ Hard Drive space, and something thats running on Windows. I intend to run 3 e-commerce sites off this, so if you think I need more power please recommend it.
Today I configured a Virtual Host (VH) for one of my customers. VH run on WindowsServer 2003 Apache 2.0.59. I enabled mod_proxy and mod_proxy_http modules and successfully loaded. Here is the VH config:
Code:
<VirtualHost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80> ServerAdmin admin@example.com ServerName www.example.com DocumentRoot C:/Apache2/htdocs/www/example.com DirectoryIndex index.php <Proxy *> Order Deny,Allow Allow from all </Proxy> ProxyRequests Off ProxyPass /cms-test [url] ProxyPassReverse /cms-test [url] ProxyPass /cms-eshop [url] ProxyPassReverse /cms-eshop [url] ErrorLog logs/www.example.com-error.log CustomLog logs/www.example.com-access.log combined </VirtualHost> According stated above proxy should map the content of yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80 and send it to client... Apache doesn't do that but redirects client directly to yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy instead, even rewriting URL, what is not proper purpose of proxy. I would expect proxy to retrieve content from yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80 and forward it to client without URL rewriting. Rewriting URL and direct aiming of client to source of content is unsuccessfull of course, because the source (yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80) trust only to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx which has a right to request a content.
Could anybody explain why proxy doesn't proxy and redirects instead?
I just went with Steadcom's VPS and they are great. I am setting things up and it's going pretty well, I have to dust off my linux/server knowledge that I haven't used in a couple of years.
Anyway I'm creating a virtual host.. I will have about 10 in the end, but right now I only have one domain IP Pointing to my new server. My registrar is NamesDirect.
When I create the virtual host, I can no longer access subdirectories directly. My Virtual Host directory is, say, /var/www/html/newdir
If I try to reach http://www.domainname.com which has been configued as a virtual host, that comes up correctly from the directory /var/www/html/newdir and works fine.
But if I try to reach http://myipaddress/newdir I get a 404 page not found error. Looking at the log, it's trying to reach /var/www/html/newdir/newdir so it's putting in the virtual host redirect even for just hitting the subdirectory directly.
Is this normal? Do I have something configured wrong? I have another domain that I have changed to IP Point to the VPS but until it propogates I won't be able to test having 2 virtual hosts.
Also.. I have not set up DNS on my VPS. I don't really understand it, and IP Pointing has always worked for me when I ran my own server form my home so I was just going to do that. But I wonder if this could be one of the problems.