I'm trying to set up Apache on CentOS 4. I'm using Apache 2.0 and it can't seem to access anything outside of the /var/www directory - it gives an Error 403.
I thought this would be down to SELinux but this is disabled. I've run the following command on the directory but with no luck:
I'm planning to setup a server ONLY for hosting of static binary files varying from few KB to few MB in size.
I've seen some of the litespeedtech performance benchmarks, which you can find here: [url]
From the "small static file" benchmark chart, i can see that IIS6 beats lighttpd in this test.
So i'm wondering does the IIS6 really have better performance at file hosting than lighttpd.
Actually it does not matter which operating system i will be using at this server, since i will use it only for file serving. With lots of concurrent connections. Possibly thousands of connections.
I need some feedbacks on this, so i can decide, IIS or lighttpd.
Few more bucks for win2k3 won't be an issue here, if it's performance is better than lighttpd for this kind of use.
my server load is max 1,it wont cross more than 1 but for 2 days iam getting 20 or more,but this load is extents for 1 or 2 min only after that it become normal to 0.58 around 1,in top i can able to see lotz apachi process when the load increase,
I'm building a new server for a predominantly php5/mysql5 website and was wondering which version of apache to put on. I know there are some issues with PHP and Apache in MPM, but what's the performance comparison between Apache 1.3 and Apache 2 Prefork?
what modules I should use in my httpd.conf file. Here's the modules that I currently have enabled / disabled. The site is running specifically off PHP. There is no need for CGI, ASP, or any other languages (to my knowledge). The negotiation module is enabled,. It does not need to be to my knowledge.
However, when I disabled it Apache would not restart. Could someone give some details as to which directives need to be disabled for negotiation to be disabled. Also, does anyone know if negotiation is essential. It is not to my knowledge. Suggestions and comments are much appreciated. Thank you in advance for your hard work and experience being as it's not costing me anything. I will do my best to return the favor.
I have centos -7 and apache 2.4.6. I have made one small php scripts and measuring the performance of server.
Average time is around 15 ms for per request. But when adding concurrent requests the average time increase too much high for the request see the below output
ab -n 10000 http://127.0.0.1/1.php
Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 Processing: 14 17 2.6 15 35 Waiting: 0 1 0.2 1 10 Total: 14 17 2.6 15 35
With Concurrent connections
ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://127.0.0.1/1.php See the processing the mean request time its around 150 ms.
Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 1.1 0 5 Processing: 25 150 24.7 153 213 Waiting: 2 134 25.2 138 194 Total: 29 150 24.1 153 216
ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://127.0.0.1/1.php See the processing the mean request time its around 150 ms when total request is 1000 only.
Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 1.1 0 5 Processing: 25 150 24.7 153 213 Waiting: 2 134 25.2 138 194 Total: 29 150 24.1 153 216
How to configure the Apache so the request time decreas to low ms ???
In Centos -7 Default configuration of MPM Directory also not found ??? checked in httpd.conf and other file also.
i manage linux apache webserver with a few wordpress blogs and from time to time i see someone inject a malicious .php file into wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ directory.
i think its some bad plugin or theme, but these is more blogs, i ugrade, update, WP, but
how can i setup some monitor to tell me which php file (or even line in php file) injected that malicious .php ? I have linux root access so i can setup anythingÂ
if there's an OS where that is possible?...i'm probably in the wrong section at this point, but i was thinking about using Remote Desktop to accomplish this...something like a Virtual Private Network... but i don't have XP pro or any other system that could act like a server...
my goal is to allow staff working off site to easily access files through windows programs like ms word or ms excel to save, edit, etc -- files would be located on the web server or on a network computer on site (not necessarily a network server)
I have download manager script that I use for my customers to download products right after the purchase.
Script generates download link that looks like this:
http://www.yourwebsite.com/download/...582921B&p=1840 (where 2YY6582921B is receipt number that is different with each purchase).
All products are placed in one folder. This folder can not be seen in above download url, but can be accessed thru browser and files can be downloaded that way without paying for them.
Can I use .htaccess and if yes how, to protect all product files the way that they can not be accessed directly by visiting url thru browser (in case somebody will find the correct url), they should be allowed for access only for my download manager script.
Code: curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_HTTPAUTH, CURLAUTH_BASIC); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_USERPWD, '[user]:[pass]'); but I can't figure out how to get past the login:
Authorization Required
This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn't understand how to supply the credentials required. Apache/2.0.52 (CentOS) Server at ****** Port 80
We will be hosting our own closed source solutions and need to be able to not give customers access to the files in their webspace.FTP and SSH access will be blocked in the firewall, so that it easy.I see it is possible to disable access to FTP users information, but the file manager is still usable in the CCP (Customer Control Panel / Hosting Panel).Can this file manager be disabled as well?
I am using dreamhost host 3 of my web sites and 1 blog. Dreamhost is great, offers alot space and bandwidth.
but I think they are oversellling their space, sometimes it gets really slow. (overselling ? ok, I dont really know, but sometimes its really slow, and most my asian readers said need to refresh to load the page. I am wondering if theres a way to check if they are overselling or not.)
I am thinking about buying vps, even tho, I still got 5 month left with dreamhost.
I found 2 vps companies are highly recommanded on this forum, JaguarPC and LiquidWeb.
theres already a post compared both companies in terms of price and service. I say I will pick JagarPc, cuz, its basic plan just 20 USD, and htey got promotion now, its even cheaper. and basic Liquidweb vps plan is 60 bucks.
I am wondering why Jagarpc is so cheap , are they overselling? how can we check if they are overselling.
I found a few posts saying how good jaguarPc is. and they are not overselling, but those members just signed up this month, and only have 1-3 posts. I cannot really trust those new members.
Can someone share their experience with JaguarPC? compare JaguarPc performance and liquidweb performance. antoher question is switch from dreamhost to JaguarPC basic vPS plan, will performance gets better?
last question: VPS account allows 3 IP, 3ip = 3 domains? if not, how many domains can I have?
We have Panel Plesk 11.5.30 in Windows 2008 R2. when you go to File Sharing in all the Subscriptions, appears this error: Internal error: Unable to access File Sharing repository with the system user name "admin": wrong username or password
This happen since we do the update to the new version 11.5.30 ...
I m newbie to apache server. I have created a web site using apache server with theURL... tutorial. I m able to access my web site on my ip address bt unable to access it using other ip of linux system. I m CentOS user. I can ping that ip with my ip. I have edited files as described in the tutorial.
I can't reach my website, I get a "corrupted content" error message in the browser.Looking into apache (version 2.4.7), I get
Code: ~$ apachectl -S AH00526: Syntax error on line 22 of /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default.conf: SSLCertificateKeyFile: file '/etc/ssl/private/owncloud.key' does not exist or is empty Action '-S' failed.
However, I double checked that the file is in the appropriate location and does contain the key, so maybe apache has no permission. afaik, it doesn't run as root all the time - or only for a short time?
permissions for the key file are as follows:
Code: ~$ sudo ls -l /etc/ssl/private/owncloud.key -rw-r--r-- 1 root ben 1704 Sep 28 04:01 /etc/ssl/private/owncloud.key
, where ben is my normal user.
It was suggested to me on the httpd IRC channel that maybe apparmor was doing something wrong, but I don't know how to investigate that.
I have installed Apache 2.4.3, and PHP 5.4.5 64-bit, and I have installed PostgreSQL 9.2 64-bits under my new system windows 7 64 bits. Apache and PHP could work nicely, and PostgreSQL run fine too. However, PHP couldn't access the PostgreSQL. pg_connect(), and followed by echo select version(), didn't give any error. When PostgreSQL module was not loaded (because my php dir was d:php, but inside httpd.conf i type D:/PHP), I got message saying something like "undefined pg_connect()." I fixed it, but select version() or any other echo after pg_connect() didn't give any output.