High Performance Firewall
Jul 17, 2009
I don't know where to start. I need advice about how to setup a high performance firewall for data center. What big companies use? I suppose that they use Cisco or Juniper firewalls. But I have specific needs. I want to control that firewall with php program - to pass IPs witch can pass the firewall. I think that I have to store them in .txt file. So the firewall must read that file.
In my case I think that I need iptables + IPset or maybe nf-HiPAC? Or transparent proxy like squid or Haproxy?
I'm very confused about the software? The firewall must forward 10GBit of traffic and 60 000+ connections
View 14 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 4, 2008
I have read on this forums and google CSF seem to be the best firewall out there, so i installed it configure and run it. After the installation i found that i received a lot time out error on web service. Page take a lot longer to load. I think it's my configuration.
Can someone take a look at my configuration if possible please share your configuration. I really like to have CSF run without poor performance on web service.
TESTING = "0"
TESTING_INTERVAL = "5"
AUTO_UPDATES = "1"
ETH_DEVICE = "eth1"
ETH_DEVICE_SKIP = ""
TCP_IN = "20,21,22,25,53,80,110,143,443,465,953,993,995,2077,2078,2082,2083,2086,2087,2095,2096,8184"
TCP_OUT = "20,21,22,25,37,43,53,80,110,113,443,587,873,953,2087,2089,2703"
UDP_IN = "20,21,53,953"
UDP_OUT = "20,21,53,113,123,873,953,6277"
ICMP_IN = "1"
ICMP_OUT = "0"
SMTP_BLOCK = "1"
SMTP_ALLOWLOCAL = "0"
MONOLITHIC_KERNEL = "0"
DROP = "DROP"
DROP_LOGGING = "1"
DROP_IP_LOGGING = "1"
DROP_ONLYRES = "0"
DROP_NOLOG = "67,68,111,113,135:139,445,513,520"
PACKET_FILTER = "1"
DROP_PF_LOGGING = "0"
VERBOSE = "1"
SYSLOG = "0"
DYNDNS = "0"
RELAYHOSTS = "1"
DENY_IP_LIMIT = "100"
GLOBAL_ALLOW = ""
GLOBAL_DENY = ""
GLOBAL_IGNORE = ""
LF_GLOBAL = ""
LF_DAEMON = "1"
LF_TRIGGER = "0"
LF_TRIGGER_PERM = "1"
LF_SELECT = "1"
LF_SSHD = "3"
LF_SSHD_PERM = "1"
LF_FTPD = "3"
LF_FTPD_PERM = "1"
LF_SMTPAUTH = "3"
LF_SMTPAUTH_PERM = "1"
LF_POP3D = "5"
LF_POP3D_PERM = "1"
LF_IMAPD = "5"
LF_IMAPD_PERM = "1"
LF_HTACCESS = "5"
LF_HTACCESS_PERM = "300"
LF_MODSEC = "0"
LF_MODSEC_PERM = "1"
LF_CPANEL = "3"
LF_CPANEL_PERM = "3600"
LF_CSF = "1"
LF_SSH_EMAIL_ALERT = "1"
LF_SU_EMAIL_ALERT = "1"
LF_SCRIPT_ALERT = "1"
LF_SCRIPT_LIMIT = "100"
LF_SCRIPT_PERM = "0"
LF_DIRWATCH = "60"
LF_DIRWATCH_DISABLE = "1"
LF_DIRWATCH_FILE = "1"
LF_INTEGRITY = "3600"
LF_INTERVAL = "300"
LF_PARSE = "5"
LF_EMAIL_ALERT = "1"
LT_EMAIL_ALERT = "1"
LT_POP3D = "60"
LT_IMAPD = "0"
RT_RELAY_ALERT = "1"
RT_RELAY_LIMIT = "100"
RT_RELAY_BLOCK = "0"
RT_AUTHRELAY_ALERT = "1"
RT_AUTHRELAY_LIMIT = "100"
RT_AUTHRELAY_BLOCK = "0"
RT_POPRELAY_ALERT = "1"
RT_POPRELAY_LIMIT = "100"
RT_POPRELAY_BLOCK = "0"
RT_LOCALRELAY_ALERT = "1"
RT_LOCALRELAY_LIMIT = "100"
RT_LOCALRELAY_BLOCK = "0"
LF_DSHIELD = "86400"
LF_DSHIELD_URL = [url]
LF_SPAMHAUS = "86400"
LF_SPAMHAUS_URL = [url]
LF_BOGON = "86400"
LF_BOGON_URL = [url]
CT_LIMIT = "300"
CT_INTERVAL = "60"
CT_EMAIL_ALERT = "1"
CT_PERMANENT = "1"
CT_BLOCK_TIME = "1800"
CT_SKIP_TIME_WAIT = "0"
CT_STATES = ""
PT_LIMIT = "30"
PT_INTERVAL = "60"
PT_SKIP_HTTP = "0"
PT_USERPROC = "8"
PT_USERMEM = "100"
PT_USERTIME = "1800"
PT_USERKILL = "0"
PT_LOAD = "30"
PT_LOAD_AVG = "5"
PT_LOAD_LEVEL = "6"
PT_LOAD_SKIP = "3600"
PT_SMTP = "0"
IPTABLES = "/sbin/iptables"
MODPROBE = "/sbin/modprobe"
IFCONFIG = "/sbin/ifconfig"
SENDMAIL = "/usr/sbin/sendmail"
NETSTAT = "/bin/netstat"
PS = "/bin/ps"
FUSER = "/sbin/fuser"
VMSTAT = "/usr/bin/vmstat"
LS = "/bin/ls"
MD5SUM = "/usr/bin/md5sum"
TAR = "/bin/tar"
CHATTR = "/usr/bin/chattr"
HTACCESS_LOG = "/usr/local/apache/logs/error_log"
MODSEC_LOG = "/usr/local/apache/logs/error_log"
SSHD_LOG = "/var/log/secure"
SU_LOG = "/var/log/secure"
FTPD_LOG = "/var/log/messages"
SMTPAUTH_LOG = "/var/log/exim_mainlog"
SMTPRELAY_LOG = "/var/log/exim_mainlog"
POP3D_LOG = "/var/log/maillog"
IMAPD_LOG = "/var/log/maillog"
CPANEL_LOG = "/usr/local/cpanel/logs/login_log"
SCRIPT_LOG = "/var/log/exim_mainlog"
View 14 Replies
View Related
Dec 17, 2014
I have these problems since version 11.5. Now I have installed version 12 on centos . FTP works fine and is super fast and speedy until i enable PLEK FIREWALL, I also tried to add passive port range 60000-65534 to Plesk Firewall rules.
But nothing works.
It takes like 10 times longer to Login + List Files + Make changes using FTP. We applying changes via FTp and its very slow. We can use plesk file manager but its very inconvenient way for quick file uploads and changes.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2009
I am currently hosting my website on one server with the specs:
2.8ghz Dual Quad-Core processor + 8 gigs of ram + two 500 hard drives with a 50 mbps unmetered bandwidth package.
My current problem lies in high server loads and very slow server performance throughout the day.
I am considering migrating over to The Planet onto server with the specs:
3.0ghz Dual Quad-Core + 18 gigs of ram + two 50gb hard drives with 2TB of monthly bandwidth transfer.
In an attempt to have great bandwidth pricing and server performance, I plan on downgrading my current server with my current host to a lowe-end server and keeping it only to host my VIDEO and MUSIC files with the 50mbps unmetered package. The Planet will then host my database and all other web related files on their new server.
Is this a good idea as an attempt to save money in bandwidth costs and eliminating my server lag issues?
I was offered a setup of a separate web and database server at my current host but from what I have read, no one touches the performance and reliability The Planet has to offer.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2008
I'd like to get your recommendations on how I should approach this problem. I posted this in another part of the forum, but I feel that this is a more appropriate place for it.
Problem:
How to handle large amounts of traffic with for a social network website? If a user uploads a photo or video, how does it become accessible on all of the server? If traffic is expected to be about 500,000 visitors a day, how many machines do you think I should use?
Possible Solution:
I've come up with the following possible infrastructure.
One load balancer. The load balancer has 3 PHP/Apache servers behind it. Behind each of the PHP/Apache servers is a (slave) MySQL server, from which data is read. Behind the slave MySQL servers, there is 1 master MySQL server, which handles all of the database writes. The master MySQL and slave MySQL servers are synced up, so data is up to date.
The actual photo and video files are not stored in the database, only the links to them is stored in the database (to keep the database small). The photo and video reside in a central location (like a SAN or NAS), which is accessible by all of the 3 PHP/Apache webservers.
Questions:
1. How many machines do you think will be able to handle photo and video uploads for 500,000 visitors a day?
2. Is having a SAN with Terabytes of RAIDED disk space an available option?
3. If a SAN or NAS is not an option, does anyone have any ideas on how to make sure all of the web servers have access to the same photos and videos? Is rsync a viable solution?
4. Which hosting provider do you think I should go with?
5. Is clustering what I need? What is clustering and how will it address my concerns?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2008
I'd like to get your recommendations on how I should approach this problem.
Problem:
How to handle large amounts of traffic with for a social network website? If a user uploads a photo or video, how does it become accessible on all of the server? If traffic is expected to be about 500,000 visitors a day, how many machines do you think I should use?
Possible Solution:
I've come up with the following possible infrastructure.
One load balancer. The load balancer has 3 PHP/Apache servers behind it. Behind each of the PHP/Apache servers is a (slave) MySQL server, from which data is read. Behind the slave MySQL servers, there is 1 master MySQL server, which handles all of the database writes. The master MySQL and slave MySQL servers are synced up, so data is up to date.
The actual photo and video files are not stored in the database, only the links to them is stored in the database (to keep the database small). The photo and video reside in a central location (like a SAN or NAS), which is accessible by all of the 3 PHP/Apache webservers.
Questions:
1. How many machines do you think will be able to handle photo and video uploads for 500,000 visitors a day?
2. Is having a SAN with Terabytes of RAIDED disk space an available option?
3. If a SAN or NAS is not an option, does anyone have any ideas on how to make sure all of the web servers have access to the same photos and videos? Is rsync a viable solution?
4. Which hosting provider do you think I should go with?
5. Is clustering what I need? What is clustering and how will it address my concerns?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2008
It should support jsp/jdk6.0/tomcat6.0/mysql5.0 or higher, and SSH is prefered.
Your advice will be highly appreciated.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2008
What are your recommendations for a high quality, high traffic firewall. Something for a colo center for a webserver, that is not too expensive.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2007
I know someone is using the wget -r command on my server to recursively grab all files in a directory, I know their IP but I do not want to ban it completely, instead I was wondering is there a way to kill a connection if the bandwidth used by that connection gets too high?
I'm running CentOS 4
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 13, 2007
I am using dreamhost host 3 of my web sites and 1 blog. Dreamhost is great, offers alot space and bandwidth.
but I think they are oversellling their space, sometimes it gets really slow. (overselling ? ok, I dont really know, but sometimes its really slow, and most my asian readers said need to refresh to load the page. I am wondering if theres a way to check if they are overselling or not.)
I am thinking about buying vps, even tho, I still got 5 month left with dreamhost.
I found 2 vps companies are highly recommanded on this forum, JaguarPC and LiquidWeb.
theres already a post compared both companies in terms of price and service. I say I will pick JagarPc, cuz, its basic plan just 20 USD, and htey got promotion now, its even cheaper. and basic Liquidweb vps plan is 60 bucks.
I am wondering why Jagarpc is so cheap , are they overselling? how can we check if they are overselling.
I found a few posts saying how good jaguarPc is. and they are not overselling, but those members just signed up this month, and only have 1-3 posts. I cannot really trust those new members.
Can someone share their experience with JaguarPC? compare JaguarPc performance and liquidweb performance. antoher question is switch from dreamhost to JaguarPC basic vPS plan, will performance gets better?
last question: VPS account allows 3 IP, 3ip = 3 domains? if not, how many domains can I have?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Dec 17, 2008
Do you recommend a software firewall when behind a hardware firewall?
All of our servers are behind Cisco ASA 5505 firewalls which we rent from Liquidweb. All are being managed correctly and setup to there optimal levels. With hardware firewalls firmly in place, do you still recommend a software firewall such as APF or IPTables (we're talking linux); in our opinion we see it as an extra administration overhead. If this is however untrue, we will change out thinking.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2008
I have a cPanel server with 4GB RAM
My server hangs time to time, once or twice a day. This is the last status when it happens.
Server Load 75.90 (2 cpus)
Memory Used 92 %
Swap Used 65.78 %
When I was still inside SSH when it happens, the processes I can see inside "top" are a lot of httpd processes.
So I "killall -9 httpd", I had to do it 30~40 times
#killall -9 httpd
#killall -9 httpd
#killall -9 httpd
x 30~40 times until no pid process found & the server load is back to normal.
Before that, I check httpd fullstatus, they look very normal, same goes to what I see inside WHM Apache status & cpu usage status.
At first I thought it was a memory problem after consulting with a server admin, so I replaced all 4GB new ram stick (such a waste)
View 12 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2014
This is my free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1998 1903 95 0 45 542
-/+ buffers/cache: 1315 683
Swap: 2662 36 2625
Not good ....
I got 5 wordpress and 5 statics website on this server and 100 visitors by 24H00 each day.
Question 1 : Why the memory is so low and the swap so high ?
Question 2 : Why i don't find high usage process in top command ?
Question 3 How can i resolve this problem ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2009
My server is very slow, High CPU, High Apache load....
I got a new server and i had setup a script on it.
No server tweaks has been done.
I run a filehosting site so it gets very slow when traffic is high.
Here is some info:
Code:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4135 filedip 19 0 12812 8892 2212 R 18.9 0.4 0:00.74 index.cgi
3140 apache 15 0 22624 9604 2768 S 17.3 0.5 1:54.45 httpd
3556 apache 15 0 22792 9592 2768 S 17.3 0.5 0:43.53 httpd
3739 apache 15 0 22672 9556 2744 S 17.3 0.5 1:09.67 httpd
3884 apache 15 0 22664 9560 2744 S 17.3 0.5 0:23.98 httpd
3474 apache 15 0 22672 9572 2756 R 16.1 0.5 1:34.09 httpd
3548 apache 15 0 22792 9560 2740 S 16.1 0.5 1:33.67 httpd
3991 apache 15 0 22640 9588 2756 S 15.1 0.5 0:22.44 httpd
3475 apache 15 0 22672 9580 2756 S 13.2 0.5 1:31.42 httpd
3493 apache 15 0 22664 9592 2768 S 12.9 0.5 1:15.52 httpd
3769 apache 15 0 22664 9580 2756 S 12.9 0.5 0:45.19 httpd
3638 apache 15 0 22664 9576 2756 S 12.3 0.5 0:32.82 httpd
3724 apache 16 0 22664 9580 2756 R 12.3 0.5 0:34.25 httpd
3626 apache 15 0 22672 9580 2756 S 11.7 0.5 0:52.54 httpd
4023 apache 16 0 22792 9560 2740 R 11.3 0.5 0:13.16 httpd
3882 apache 15 0 22664 9576 2756 S 10.1 0.5 0:38.56 httpd
3005 apache 15 0 22672 9588 2768 R 9.1 0.5 2:06.61 httpd
I dont know much about server managment...
how to fix this so server doesnt go slow?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2009
I have a site that is eating up my server resources and need to know what the best solution for this is. I'm thinking of getting another server just for mysql but do not know what specs the server should be to handle the current traffic/database load and have the site run smoothly without slowing down to a snail's pace.
An alternative is to get another server just for the videos being served and leave the database and html on the current server. This is where I'm stuck and don't know what route to take with this.
My current server stats:
Dual Xeon 5130
4GB RAM
250GB
50 Mbit/sec
CentOS 3.9
Website traffic stats:
15,000 visitors/day
150,000 pageviews/day
Serving videos
I've attached screenshots of top and bandwidth usage per day. Hopefully with this information you could tell me if I need another server or if there are any things I can do to the current server to help things move faster.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2008
I've found a dedicated server at a great price and plan to stick with it, my first ( already have 2 vps accounts ). I don't have the money for a hardware firewall. However, I do have a chance to renew a Kerio WinRoute Firewall license from way back.
Does anyone think this would be better than the default windows 2003 firewall?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2008
I am running in a High load problem lately. I have one of those cheap 1and1 servers which was running fine until 2 weeks ago. Once I rebooted accidentaly, it did not come back with some unrepairable kernel errors and I had to re-image it.
I chose to reimage the server with CentOS 5, for better support. The new re-image worked fine for some days, at least so I thought and now I am having high loads. The server crashes if not monitored every moment as the load is unpredictable.
Just a restart of the Apache will bring the server back to normality, but I am not sure if it is apache or some other script to be blamed.
I have beeing monitoring through apache server-status, but I cannot organize something unusual in the high load moments.
At this moment for example:
top - 09:00:36 up 15:43, 3 users, load average: 3.57, 4.60, 5.32
Tasks: 144 total, 2 running, 142 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 10.6%us, 6.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 18.7%id, 63.5%wa, 0.2%hi, 0.5%si, 0.0%st
12:00:29 AM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
12:10:01 AM all 9.14 0.00 5.52 44.66 0.00 40.68
12:20:14 AM all 6.83 0.00 3.98 27.88 0.00 61.32
12:30:10 AM all 6.44 0.00 4.20 81.25 0.00 8.11
12:40:09 AM all 5.25 0.00 4.09 81.93 0.00 8.73
12:50:15 AM all 5.11 0.00 3.79 90.74 0.00 0.36
01:00:07 AM all 7.22 0.00 4.52 57.11 0.00 31.15
01:10:13 AM all 6.89 0.00 4.01 55.38 0.00 33.71
01:20:14 AM all 4.37 0.00 3.27 41.88 0.00 50.48
01:30:25 AM all 4.26 0.00 3.29 63.42 0.00 29.03
01:40:06 AM all 27.18 0.00 4.75 58.27 0.00 9.80
01:50:03 AM all 29.64 0.00 6.61 51.50 0.00 12.25
02:00:07 AM all 27.00 0.00 8.48 55.49 0.00 9.03
02:10:10 AM all 19.29 0.00 4.97 73.80 0.00 1.94
02:20:04 AM all 37.85 0.00 6.78 40.70 0.00 14.67
02:30:05 AM all 15.65 0.00 4.80 68.47 0.00 11.08
02:40:08 AM all 9.06 0.00 5.60 37.49 0.00 47.86
02:50:07 AM all 5.36 0.00 3.62 42.29 0.00 48.73
03:00:02 AM all 6.05 0.00 4.08 47.27 0.00 42.60
03:10:02 AM all 4.22 0.00 3.68 38.17 0.00 53.93
03:20:02 AM all 4.06 0.00 3.75 41.37 0.00 50.82
03:30:22 AM all 4.42 0.00 3.93 45.25 0.00 46.41
03:40:11 AM all 4.34 0.00 3.95 39.58 0.00 52.13
03:50:02 AM all 4.67 0.00 4.01 32.53 0.00 58.80
04:00:08 AM all 3.72 0.00 3.87 28.40 0.00 64.02
04:10:02 AM all 13.49 0.00 6.58 20.82 0.00 59.10
04:20:01 AM all 6.70 0.00 4.63 6.06 0.00 82.61
04:30:02 AM all 1.44 0.00 1.21 4.75 0.00 92.59
04:40:01 AM all 12.42 0.00 8.12 7.65 0.00 71.81
04:50:02 AM all 1.43 0.00 1.07 4.02 0.00 93.47
05:00:02 AM all 1.60 0.00 1.40 8.62 0.00 88.38
05:10:10 AM all 3.80 0.00 3.02 17.86 0.00 75.32
05:20:06 AM all 5.10 0.00 4.22 23.34 0.00 67.34
05:30:02 AM all 1.54 0.00 1.40 11.22 0.00 85.85
05:40:05 AM all 1.75 0.00 1.89 13.12 0.00 83.23
05:50:12 AM all 2.15 0.00 2.22 18.92 0.00 76.72
06:00:02 AM all 1.92 0.00 2.01 12.87 0.00 83.20
06:10:02 AM all 2.27 0.00 2.16 11.53 0.00 84.04
06:20:03 AM all 3.56 0.00 3.02 25.26 0.00 68.16
06:30:10 AM all 2.66 0.00 2.05 18.13 0.00 77.16
06:40:02 AM all 2.58 0.00 2.25 22.87 0.00 72.30
06:50:02 AM all 2.68 0.00 1.92 15.77 0.00 79.63
07:00:03 AM all 3.06 0.00 2.48 26.01 0.00 68.46
07:10:03 AM all 3.65 0.00 3.20 36.54 0.00 56.61
07:10:03 AM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
07:20:03 AM all 4.40 0.00 3.28 43.86 0.00 48.46
07:30:02 AM all 4.10 0.00 3.17 31.30 0.00 61.43
07:40:06 AM all 7.67 0.00 3.95 50.79 0.00 37.59
07:50:02 AM all 4.72 0.00 3.11 44.30 0.00 47.86
08:00:03 AM all 5.57 0.00 3.72 47.15 0.00 43.56
08:10:07 AM all 10.66 0.00 3.59 71.62 0.00 14.13
08:20:17 AM all 5.67 0.00 3.42 58.81 0.00 32.10
08:30:10 AM all 11.12 0.00 3.49 76.71 0.00 8.67
08:40:03 AM all 7.00 0.00 3.36 47.94 0.00 41.71
Average: all 7.53 0.00 3.76 38.90 0.00 49.81
Some configurations:
The reimage partittioning looks like this:
/dev/sda1 950M 138M 765M 16% /
/dev/sda5 4.7G 1.9G 2.9G 40% /usr
/dev/sda7 63G 58G 5.0G 93% /var
/dev/sda6 4.7G 23M 4.7G 1% /home
none 1.0G 500K 1.0G 1% /tmp
KeepAlive On
MaxKeepAliveRequests 300
KeepAliveTimeout 15
<IfModule prefork.c>
StartServers 10
MinSpareServers 20
MaxSpareServers 50
ServerLimit 256
MaxClients 180
MaxRequestsPerChild 2000
</IfModule>
<IfModule worker.c>
StartServers 2
MaxClients 150
MinSpareThreads 25
MaxSpareThreads 75
ThreadsPerChild 25
MaxRequestsPerChild 0
</IfModule>
[mysqld]
datadir=/var/lib/mysql
socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
skip-locking
query_cache_limit=1M
query_cache_size=32M
query_cache_type=1
max_connections=250
interactive_timeout=100
wait_timeout=20
connect_timeout=10
thread_cache_size=80
key_buffer=64M
join_buffer=1M
max_allowed_packet=16M
table_cache=512
record_buffer=1M
sort_buffer_size=1M
read_buffer_size=1M
max_connect_errors=10
thread_concurrency=2
read_rnd_buffer_size=1M
myisam_sort_buffer_size=64M
server-id=1
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 3
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
stepping : 4
cpu MHz : 2793.324
cache size : 1024 KB
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2008
I have extremely high CPU load average, but when I run TOP command there are not any process with high CPU
CPU load averages:
211.65 (1 min) 227.29 (5 mins) 247.89 (15 mins)
Tasks: 364 total, 2 running, 360 sleeping, 2 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 99.7%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 2065460k total, 2012372k used, 53088k free, 60964k buffers
Swap: 2040212k total, 3280k used, 2036932k free, 619900k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
19871 root 15 0 4944 2488 1656 R 1 0.1 0:02.73 top
1 root 15 0 4208 1320 1136 S 0 0.1 0:01.55 init
2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0
3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:01.77 ksoftirqd/0
4 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.01 migration/1
5 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:01.16 ksoftirqd/1
6 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:01.04 events/0
7 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.65 events/1
8 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper
9 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
35 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.15 kblockd/0
36 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/1
37 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
127 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:13.16 ata/0
128 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/1
129 root 10 -5 0 0 0 D 0 0.0 0:01.15 ata_aux
130 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
158 root 16 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
159 root 15 0 0 0 0 D 0 0.0 0:01.00 pdflush
160 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:10.68 kswapd0
161 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
So my server is "unresponsive" for abour 18 hours, burst net didnt answer my tickets and I dont know what to do. Ive been with this setup for almost 5 months with no problems, No changes have been made to hardware or software.
Im using Centos 5.0
View 10 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2008
We run a very busy web application written in .net . The backend is SQL 2005. The server running SQL for this web app is slammed constantly. CPU is red lined, and the disks are queuing up because they cant keep up with the demand. What I am wondering is what do the big websites do to gain performance? What direction should we start moving in to get ahead of the curve. We are using an HP DL 580 with 4 x quad core xeons and the fastest SAS drives we could get.
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2008
Any rumors known already?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 10, 2007
Does anyone have experience using LVM2? We'd rely on hardware RAID mirroring for the underlying physical redundancy, but we're very interested in LVM2's storage virtualization features.
If anyone can share their experiences with LVM2 with regards to performance and possibly use in a SAN environment,
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2007
Hypothetical Scenario:
Let's say I've got a single website built in Drupal (using PHP and MySQL). It gets less than a 1,000 visits per day and needs very little storage or bandwidth. The site is currently on a shared host and it runs okay, but often has very slow page loads due to sluggish MySQL calls and other traffic on the server. Sometimes the homepage loads in 2s but other times it takes 20-30s depending on time of day. The client is sick of this performance on such a low traffic site and wants to improve the situation.
Question: Will a VPS really provide that much better performance than a shared host?
Remember I'm talking ONLY about page load time under minimal load. No need to take into account scaling or Digg/Slashdot effects.
I know dedicated is the best option but it seems crazy for such a low traffic site. A lot of the VPS offers are very attractive in theory (managed and affordable) but in practice I'm concerned that even a 512MB VPS with 1GB burst won't make much of a performance difference.
Mainly I don't want to go to the hassle and extra monthly expense of moving everything to a VPS for only a minimal gain.
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2007
We shifted one website based on Article Dashboard (its an article directory script coded in Zend) to a Godaddy VPS ($35 per month) from a shared hosting account with hostgator.
This VPS is really slow compared to hostgator account.
Can anyone tell what we should do?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2009
Im planning on buying a NAS from my provider for using as a backend to my VPSes (around 15). The plan is to put the server images on the NAS so the VPSes can be moved without interruption between different nodes.
The server i have looked on so far is the following:
CPU: Xeon 3330 2,67Ghz
RAM: 4GB DDR2
HDD: 8*Barracuda 7200.12 1000GB, 7200rpm, 32MB, SATA-II
RAID: 3Ware 9650SE
Network: Intel 2*1Gbit
Would it be enough to fill the Gbit-line?
The budget is pretty tight so if it's possible to do this with SATA drives it would be great, otherwise it could be a possibilty to go down in diskspace and switch the SATA drives to SCSI/SAS drives.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2009
We are getting into VPS hosting and wanted to get some opinions and feedback as we're quite unsure on what to expect as for performance and how many clients we can generally keep on a box.
For now we've bought 3 dell R710 with dual Xeon L5520, 72GB ram and 8 x 2.5" SAS drives.
We are thinking of a base offering of 512 megabytes of ram and
was hoping to get about 40-50 onto a server.
With 40 there should be -plenty- free ram and plenty drivecache.
Then a next offering of 1 gig ram and next one of 2 gigs.
Even if we do the biggest 2 gig offering with 25 on a server we should have free ram to spare.
The software would be virtuozzo.
Any thoughts on this, am I expecting too much, or am I being fairly realistic?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2009
I have been working with Xen over the last week or so and I can't figure out why the performance is downgraded so much when booting into Xen. There are certain things that seem just as fast but other things just don't seem normal.
I have tried this on two different quad-core systems, one new generation (York) with CentOS5 and one old (Kent) with Debian Lenny but neither seem to produce good speeds.
For example, when I use the default kernels I can usually get about ~600 score out of unixbench-wht and things such as top and core systems show up as 0% cpu when running top.
When I boot into Xen kernel however, whether it been from Dom0 or the guest OS, top uses about 3% CPU and unixbench-wht produces scores under 250.
I have set vcpus to 4 and have even tried vcpu-pin 0 0, 1 1, 2 2, 3 3 but nothing seems to be changing anything. The disk speeds seem about the same (hdparm). I'm assuming it is something with the CPU,
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2009
I have to leave the Supermicro servers and use only Dell. I have this question.
There is a big difference in performance between these two RAID configurations?
Dell - 2 x 1TB RAID1 PERC6
Supermicro - 4 x 500GB RAID10 3ware 4 port
It is for use with webhosting.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2009
I need some advice on my situaton at my host, and possibly some frame of reference as to what can/should be expected from a VPS setup like mine and what I can expect it to manage.
I have a site that sees some traffic of about 150k pageviews per day. On any given day, it peaks for roughly a timespan of 4 hours per day where there may be about 5 req/s.
I use a standard setup (LAMP) running mod_php in Apache, not fast cgi. I have a VPS on Virtuozzos Power Panel that has 1,5 GB RAM and really an unkonwn amount of CPU. I haven't been able to ascertain that information but probably could if I asked my host.
The problem is that during these hours it gets a bit slow from time to time. Running TOP shows sometimes a staggering amount of waiting processes i.e. the load is quite high (15 - 25).
So, I'm now really at a fork in the road where I either start looking into going with a different setup, say Nginx + PHP-FPM (FCGI) and try to see if that makes a difference. I'm not really an admin so I would be kind of lost on that. I could also start looking into my code to see if I can cache more or do smarter stuff etc.
However, before doing any of the above, I'd like to ask this crowd here if you think that I've sort of hit the roof on what can be expected from a VPS of the size I just told you about. That my situation is quite normal and that the real solution is actually just to upgrade my VPS. Is it?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2009
Lets assume that we (me and the people I'm working with) were to launch a really powerful website. Then all of a sudden there is more demand for the website than the backend infrastructure can handle.
What do we do?
- 1000 users (ok so one powerful server should be enough).
- 2000 users (lets setup an additional server to work as the HTTP while the powerful server acts as the database only).
- 3000 users (lets eliminate all the commercial linux programs and install a fresh version of linux on both boxes and compile only the programs we need).
- 5000 (lets setup another server that handles the sessions).
- 6000 (lets setup a static-only server to deliver the non-dynamic content).
- 7000 (lets do some caching ... ugh maybe it won't be enough).
Any greater and what? We've run out of ideas on how to separate the code logic and how to optimize every byte of data on the website! What do we do? We can buy more servers, but how do we balance the load?
This is where I'm stuck at. In the past I've separated the load in a modular sense (one server does this and one server does that), but eventually I'll come across a wall.
how clustering works? What I wanna know is how is the information, whether it be the server-side code or the static information, is shared across machines. Is it worth it anymore to learn these things, or is it worth it just to host with a scalable hosting solution like AWS?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2008
How much faster is a 10k rpm HDD vs a 7200 rpm HDD in a server environment?
IMO, a 7200 rpm HDD is much faster than 5400 rpm HDD when it comes down to desktop PCs..
Just wondering if it's worth upgrading to a 10k rpm HDD from a 7200 rpm HDD and losing about 1TB of storage as well...
(Comparing specifically 2 750GB 16mb cache 7200rpm SATA 2 HDD RAID 1 with 2 150GB 16mb cache 10krpm HDD in RAID 1)
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2008
From the Disk I/O performance is it better
1) to have main PHP file with 10 includes
2) all 11 files as one file
3) the difference is not big
Suppose
a) a low traffic site
b) a high traffice site
View 7 Replies
View Related
