My friend recommend me Juniper firewall which his company uses to protect over 10 servers and to detect & drop DDOS attack. The problem is he do not know the product series.
Since I am here, I wanted to ask as well, has anyone uses Juniper firewall.
I was told they are the cheapest or at least affordable hardware firewall in the market.
I am in need to protect 7 machines.
No matter how hard you look for a colo datacenter, they all seem to push hard on offering fancy services and causing a big impression. There's nothing wrong with that, but as a result, costs typically go up beyond those of dedicated servers.
Would this work for offering affordable colo and still make a profit:
- no customer visits, all equipment shipped, plugged in, and turned on: requires no fancy reception area, less security measures, no parking space, no glossy facilities.
- limit power requirements or charge per watt consumed: avoids charging customers by max available power and charge for the amount actually used.
If that's a possibility, there just might be a market out there for cheap colo for the masses.
Does anyone know of a firm that offered PCI certification for a low price (something in the ballpark of $200-300)? I have Google'd it and turned up companies charging $1500-5000 per year, which is retarded.
I have already run a PCI compliance scan from Comodo and came back clean, so I would like to get the certification done
I am in need to get a UPS for my 20 amp circuit in one of my datacenters. For whatever reason at least once a month the power will go down for a few seconds and then causing FSCK on my servers.
I need an affordable solution that will give me a few minutes of power so that at least the servers don't crash. E-mail notification would be nice too but not required.
Just need about 3 near SF.
The closer the better.
Budget ~100/server
Every webhost I see that offers dedicated hosting always sticks with the same price range: $60 - $90 for crap Celerons/P4s, $160 - $220 for Xeons, and $250+ for better servers. Is there a reliable host that offers much lower prices and has a reliable network? I am currently using The Planet and for years have been paying $260 with tech support and heck that is extra money that could be in my pocket with a cheaper service.
My current Dual Xeon 2.4ghz is overkill since the CPU load is never high and pushes all 12 of my sites with ease since they are all optimized and coded to never cause large loads.
I've been reading a lot of positive VPS provider reviews but when I checked out most of them they are mostly linux providers only.
Is there any windows VPS provider that anyone can recommend based on affordability, reliability and their support?
I know there are a lot of VPS offers on the ad section but I do not want to be deciding just because they have good offers. I want to base my decision on more factors not just price.
i've got a server that averages 3-4 TB a month. it is starting to max out the limits on the servers capacity and i want to setup another server on a different network that can help load balance, and if one of the servers are down for any reason the other server would take on all the load while the other server is down.
what is the best solution for this?
Prospective web hosting clients have to understand that there's a clear difference between a cheap hosting service and an affordable one.
For one, an afordable service has to do with the budget of the client, meaning the cient has a an amount he will like to spend on a web host account while a cheap web hosting service has to do with the price of the product in relation with the services offered. For example a shared host that you get for $10 will definitey have more features than a shared that cost $3.99.
You have to know what you want before taking an action that you may regret later.
any affordable web hosting for a proxy website?
what i mean affordable is as cheap as possible, and this is a proxy site, not a proxy list.
I'm looking for an affordable (a.k.a. fairly cheap) stable dedi that allows IRC. It will mainly be used to host a few websites, but it needs to be IRC allowed as well (the irc portion will be very small). Does anyone know any good hosts? Most of the cheaper hosts I've looked into don't allow IRC at all .
- IRC allowed
- US preferably; not necessary
- Managed or un-managed, doesn't matter
- Decent price
- Need somewhere around 20-35 IPs
does anyone have experience setting up big storage system for photo-sharing/videos or similar website?
This for example is not affordable for many - aws.amazon.com/s3
Im talking about 20 - 40TB system.
BEST RELIABLE HOSTING, affordable hosting
ALLOWED: warez linking - nulled script - legal porn
warez linking allowed
nulled script allowed
Host Unlimited Domains
Unlimited Sub Domains
Unlimited Email, MySQL, FTP
PHP5, MySQL5, CGI, Perl5
DDOS Proof, ionCube, Ruby
99.99% Uptime Guarantee
cPanel® 11, WHM, Fantastico
Web Hosting Control Panel
MS Frontpage WebSite Hosting
ImageMagick 5.5.2 Support
Unlimited Email and FTP Accounts
Fast, Free 24/7 Tech Suppor
Reseller Hosting Available
2 Web Based E-Mail Programs
Streaming Audio/Video Hosting
SUPER 12$ year
5 Go Storage
30 Gb Transfer
Control Panel
EXPERT 24$/year
20 Gb Storage
100 Gb Transfer
EXPERT 36$/year
50 Gb Storage
600 Gb Transfer
GOLD HOSTING
»FREE DOMAIN NAME
» 100 Gb Disk Space
» Unlimited Bandwidth
50 $/YEAR
RESELLER HOSTING
w w w .azhosty .com
Do you recommend a software firewall when behind a hardware firewall?
All of our servers are behind Cisco ASA 5505 firewalls which we rent from Liquidweb. All are being managed correctly and setup to there optimal levels. With hardware firewalls firmly in place, do you still recommend a software firewall such as APF or IPTables (we're talking linux); in our opinion we see it as an extra administration overhead. If this is however untrue, we will change out thinking.
I've found a dedicated server at a great price and plan to stick with it, my first ( already have 2 vps accounts ). I don't have the money for a hardware firewall. However, I do have a chance to renew a Kerio WinRoute Firewall license from way back.
Does anyone think this would be better than the default windows 2003 firewall?
after install apf firewall whole server blocked to everyone.. i can't get ping back as well. Any idea?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm planning to place some firewalls in my network, but I'm afraid of something.
I have never used cisco pix, checkpoints and others.. We currently use custom made linux solutions for that
When we use these ready-to-go boxes, do we need to NAT the internal server IPs?
Is it possible to use these ready-to-go solutions with REAL IPs in the servers?
Does cPanel work well with NATed internal IPs? Or shall I have some trouble?
Do you think it's safer to with NATed, or it will be better to use real ips instead?
I was wondering what everyone thinks the best Firewall software is for a dedicated server?
View 7 Replies View RelatedIm using the latest cPanel release. Using Pure-FTPD as the ftp server. I have CSF Firewall installed and configured and have also got [url]installed. on the dos deflate software ive set the ban limit to 250 connections.
But what my problem is that while downloading on ftp clients with internet that can download very fast that it will ban them. Ive kinda realised that it is to do with the DDos software but im unsure what i should do. Increase the limit of connections but that would mean that more minor Ddos attacks might get through so that would affect more clients. Or leave the limit at 250 and let clients get blocked for 20 minutes.
Or alternatively is there a way i can stop people getting banned via FTP completly. As i dont see that option on the Ddos or csf.
I´m running the remote desktop service and configuring a remote dedicated server right now.
So, I need to install a firewall in this machine, but I don´t want to be disconnected after the installation.
So, can anyone tell me of a firewall that don´t stop the connection of RDP just after installation and works with Windows 2003 Server?
secure a LAN network with 200 computers, a specific hardware solution (like CISCO PIX or so) might not be available.
Though, I'm considering a Firewall OS based Solution like pfSense, m0n0wall, eBox, Endian Firewall, SmoothWall, etc.
There are so many options and I have no experience with none of this. My Requirements are:
Web based configuration
Clean Interface with graphic statistics
Pretty Secure
Good hardware support
Free usage
Simple configuration
Support for high bandwidth usage
I think OpenBSD is pretty secure, is there any OpenBSD Firewall OS solution with this requirements?
What better firewall to vps?
In my vps not use csf or iptables
Virtuozzo has bug that.
What do you think of this two firewall? which one is better overall?
View 14 Replies View RelatedI am looking to setup a Firewall etc... on a VPS and would like to know what is the better one and easy to use etc...
CSF or APF and BFD ?
know of any hardware firewall (or suggest) which is under 300 USD and can protect around 5 servers with a total bandwidth capacity of 100 (+/-) Mbps. I am really no security expert
Of course, it should have web based management, online documentation (not really needed) and something special for prevent DoS attacks automatically (really fed up of them).
If possible if you can link me directly to an online store that can ship it Internationally / Europe?
I was having attacks so I installed CSF firewall which did a great job. However on a few of my sites, specifically proxy ones, every second or third page you visit will be a 403 Forbidden error. After about 20-30 seconds, you can refresh and it goes away. I suspect CSF is causing this, because it just started to happen after I installed it. Is it thinking there are too many connections or too much bandwidth and its blocking me or other users just using the proxy? Is there a way to make it slightly more tolerant?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am a non technical type that is trying to start a web based business. I am thnking a dedicated server will be the best option for me but as I looked at the quotes from several different web hosts I noticed that the firewall services that they provide are very expensive. 100$ a month - 150$ a month.
Are there other firewall options that can be installed on the server that we as administrators can install and use?
I have had a fair few hack attempts from ip numbers that are on the same
provider ;telewest' that i am on - is there anyway of getting this takne further other than contacting isp?
Jun 9 21:49:04 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 122.24.44.198:2426 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:49:04 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 122.24.44.198:2426 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:49:04 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 122.24.44.198:2426 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:49:08 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 211.75.135.2:2261 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:49:08 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 211.75.135.2:2261 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:49:08 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 211.75.135.2:2261 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:50:16 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 204.16.209.44:51324 82.39.142.27:1026 in via en0
Jun 9 21:50:16 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 204.16.209.44:51324 82.39.142.27:1026 in via en0
Jun 9 21:50:16 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 204.16.209.44:51324 82.39.142.27:1026 in via en0
Jun 9 21:50:16 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 204.16.209.44:51324 82.39.142.27:1027 in via en0
Jun 9 21:50:16 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 204.16.209.44:51324 82.39.142.27:1027 in via en0
Jun 9 21:50:16 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 204.16.209.44:51324 82.39.142.27:1027 in via en0
Jun 9 21:50:36 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 121.34.113.29:27207 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:50:36 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 121.34.113.29:27207 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:50:36 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 121.34.113.29:27207 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:59:38 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 58.221.225.230:4151 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:59:38 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 58.221.225.230:4151 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 21:59:38 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 58.221.225.230:4151 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:38 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36236 82.39.142.27:1027 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:38 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36236 82.39.142.27:1027 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:38 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36236 82.39.142.27:1027 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:38 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36236 82.39.142.27:1026 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:38 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36236 82.39.142.27:1026 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:38 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36236 82.39.142.27:1026 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:39 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36240 82.39.142.27:1026 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:39 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36240 82.39.142.27:1026 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:39 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36240 82.39.142.27:1026 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:39 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36240 82.39.142.27:1027 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:39 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36240 82.39.142.27:1027 in via en0
Jun 9 22:00:39 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 35000 Deny UDP 220.164.140.236:36240 82.39.142.27:1027 in via en0
Jun 9 22:03:45 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 125.195.44.229:2212 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 22:03:45 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 125.195.44.229:2212 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 22:03:45 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 125.195.44.229:2212 82.39.142.27:135 in via en0
Jun 9 22:03:48 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 82.39.189.11:4628 82.39.142.27:2967 in via en0
Jun 9 22:03:48 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 82.39.189.11:4628 82.39.142.27:2967 in via en0
Jun 9 22:03:48 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 82.39.189.11:4628 82.39.142.27:2967 in via en0
Jun 9 22:03:51 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 82.39.189.11:4628 82.39.142.27:2967 in via en0
Jun 9 22:03:51 mark-scorfields-computer ipfw: 12190 Deny TCP 82.39.189.11:4628
Lately one of my servers have been getting syn floods and ddos attacks (repeatedly for the last 2 weeks). The attacks are not as bad as they were the last 2 weeks, but my software firewall (iptables and csf) is not doing the job anymore. It can't handle such large attacks.
I picked up a netgear firewall, but it has dhcp and lan, which made it have no use to me. All my servers are on static ips, so I would be unable to use a lan.
Is there a firewall available which would allow me to setup something like this (Server 1 is the one getting attacked):
Internet ---> Firewall ---> 48 Port Switch ---> Server 1, Server 2, and so on
or
Internet ---> 48 Port Switch ---> Firewall ---> Server 1
Other servers come off the Switch
I saw the Cisco Pix on ebay, but am not sure of all the features it holds. I basically need a firewall without any lan capaibilites, no routing, just a plain firewall that will protect from DDoS and Syn Floods (if possible, also email me the logs). Also needs to push up to 20Mbps (100Mbps would be best though).
I looked into m0n0wall and pfsense, but their software didn't make any sense to me. I tried setting it up on a PIII 700Mhz with 768MB Ram but never got the webConfig to work.
Price is not a huge issue, I just need these attacks to end. any suggestions on software firewalls let me know.
Which is the best firewall in linux unix servers..................
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a client who requires a firewall with VPN support. He will be utilizing around 10mbit of traffic at most. What would be a suggested firewall to go with that would properly handle vpn?
View 10 Replies View Related