9550 Better Than 3220

Oct 25, 2009

i am having lot of DB load issues on 3220 server i was offered 9550 server or 5520 or dual nehlam server presently i can afford 250$ monthly for a server so what you suggest upgrading to 9550 will solve

View 14 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

How Intel Core2Quad 9550 (Yorkfield) Is Compared To Harpertown

Feb 20, 2009

Intel Core2Quad Yorkfield 2.83GHZ w/ 12Mb L2 Cache

Intel Dual Xeon E5405 (8 x 2.00GHZ 2 x 12MB Cache)

Is there a big difference?

View 7 Replies View Related

Xeon 3060 Vs 3220

Jun 4, 2008

I can't find any direct comparisons but I am thinking of upping our server to quad core. I'm just wondering if there is a direct comparison out there - and frankly hoping it won't be much of one seeing as how it's dual core vs. quad core.

View 13 Replies View Related

Xeon 3220 Vs. E8400

Jul 2, 2008

what would you recommend as more powerfull processor for the dedicated server (for one heavy traffic php+mysql site)?

The price is almost same, I would like to choose better proc, not the cheaper one. The rest is same: 2 GB RAM, 250 GB SATAII HD.

View 11 Replies View Related

CPU Load For Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz

Mar 23, 2009

what are low and what is considered high load for a Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GH server?

for example is 1.50 considered high?

View 10 Replies View Related

Xeon 3220 Vs Q6600 Vs Q8200

Mar 23, 2009

Xeon 3220 (2.40Ghz 4MB Cache)
vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.44Ghz 8MB Cache)
vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 (2.33Ghz 4MB Cache)

How do these CPU's compare to each other? From what I've read so far I'm leaning towards the Q6600.

View 14 Replies View Related

Xeon 3220 Quad Core 2.4 Or 3070 Dual Core 2.66 For DB

Apr 22, 2008

Shall I chose the xeon quad core 2.4 GHZ or the dual core 2.66 GHZ for an adserver's database?

View 3 Replies View Related

Xeon 3220 Vs Xeon 5410

Apr 13, 2008

Softlayer is pricing these both the same, and I've been a big fan of the
x3220 for a long time now. I haven't been able to fine ANY reasonably priced servers that can out perform the x3220 in computational ability.

That said, does anyone have any figures that would suggest the 5410 is better?

Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5410 - 2.33GHz (Harpertown) - 1 x 12MB cache
vs
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache

Clearly the cache is bigger, but for me, it's about speed and computation.

I can't find any references to the x5410 in the VPS vs Dedicated thhread.

View 3 Replies View Related

Quad Core Xeon 3220 Vs Quad Core Xeon 5310

May 12, 2008

Which is a better option? Both priced same, I know with the Xeon 5310 the possibility of upgrading to dual cpu's.

Quote:

Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache

Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5310 - 1.60GHz (Clovertown) - 1 x 8MB cache

Which would give higher performance in a shared web hosting environment?

View 12 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved