I installed modsecurity from Addone module in Cpanel
When I try to apply phpshell woork good without a mistakes and I can do anything despite of the presence of protection modsecurity and disable_functions in php.ini.
Is there a particular settings add to the httpd.conf to prevent application phpshell or prevent upload it to the site?
i want to prevent c99shell scripts from running.
I found this rule to detect URI's for the c99 shell.
#new kit
SecFilterSelective REQUEST_URI "/c99shell.txt"
SecFilterSelective REQUEST_URI "/c99.txt?"
My problem is that the hackers are being more stealthy and calling the
script some random name like .../myphpstuff.php. So the URI no longer helps detect it.
How could I detect "c99shell" in the actual file that apache servers? This assumes that the hacker was successfully in installing it.
my box
Apache 1.3.37
WHM 11.2.0 cPanel 11.11.0-R16983
FEDORA 5 i686 - WHM X v3.1.0
Recently my site was defaced, (i own a dedicated server), my server was not touched, but one of the applications I used on the site was exploited to gain access to it.
I have noticed 4 or 5 c99 shells in different locations on my ftp. The site is back online, but it's definitely possible that they have one of these hidden somewhere and that they'll just do it again. I am using cent os 5
How can I easily search for these on my box? Can I disable their functionality? is there setting I can use in htaccess or something to make my website safer? I visited one of the scripts, and it said SAFEMODE OFF, how can I at least enable safemode?
I don't know much of anything about linux, but I am running cpanel and WHM. I have a guy who manages my box but he is hard to get a hold of sometimes, and I'd like to take care of this ASAP!
I found these folders in the root
/usr/bin/c99
/usr/include/boost/numeric/interval/detail/c99_rounding_control.hpp
/usr/include/boost/numeric/interval/detail/c99sub_rounding_control.hpp
what are these ? is it normal folders ? or somebody hacked our server?
what shall I do?
I just installed zen cart on my webhosting and after few days later i saw some file written like core1405.php and when i open to view the file it is actually trojan c99shell.
I have deleted all of the core file. Now how can i prevent it from happen again? Cause it is too much work to clean up the hosting server.
How to stops the scripts like c99 shell from installing into the server?
View 1 Replies View Relatedguys im tired off fighting those hackers everyday! i have about 20 websites,and everyday i have one of them hacked! i restore a backup then another one hacked!
thats unbelivable!!!
those bastards upload there shell scripts to websites via bugs or whatever from php files!!
is there anyway to stop these commands?
can .htaccess helps? how?
i talked to my webhosting companies for my websites! ....
the biggest security issue i have with my clients is php c99 shell and similar php files, somehow these files uploaded on the website and from here they start attacking the websites.
i have seen also that once you upload the c99 php file you are able to see the accounts information ( such as a user name ) on the same server
so is there any way to disable this kind of php file or at least disable some function within the file!
i have been thinking to install and run a antivirus on the server , but i see sometimes they upload the encrypted version of the file , so the antirus can't catch the file as a torjan!
how i can detect and disable C99 shell and another shell script exp:r57 ....
View 9 Replies View RelatedIs there a way to stop them totally? i.e. even though they are successfully uploaded but I do not want the source to be available to them etc.?
I mean, is there a way to hide or not allow them to execute any shell?
I have few scripts, but hackers again upload at some way c99, and hack some SMF forums at server. Server like server they cannot hack, but user account they can. So please tell me what you advice?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have been using mod_security 1.9.x since it first release on apache 1.3 and apache 2.0.x, rules are great and they work perfect with no issues at all with any php-mysql website. Do you recommend using mod_security 2.0 or 2.5 ? (I do know that 2.5 does not work with apache 1.3).
View 2 Replies View Relatedusing mod_security, but I believe that I have it installed correctly with some rules that should be generating entries in the security audit log. No matter what I do, I can't seem to get mod_security to generate any sort of log entries.
I am using version 2.1.7. I compiled it with no problems. In my httpd.conf file, I have the following relevant lines:
LoadFile /usr/lib/libxml2.so
LoadModule security2_module modules/mod_security2.so
Include conf/modsecurity/*.conf
I don't think there are any problems here, as I know it is running directives from the configuration file I edited. This is the file I'm working with:
modsecurity_crs_10_config.conf
Here are the relevant lines from the config file:
SecRuleEngine On
SecRequestBodyAccess On
SecResponseBodyAccess On
SecResponseBodyMimeType (null) text/html text/plain text/xml
SecResponseBodyLimit 524288
SecDefaultAction "phase:2,auditlog,log,pass,status:500"
SecAuditEngine On
SecAuditLogType Serial
SecAuditLog logs/modsec_audit.log
SecAuditLogParts "ABIFHZ"
SecRequestBodyInMemoryLimit 131072
SecDebugLog logs/modsec_debug.log
SecDebugLogLevel 3
I know that the config file is being read because when I start apache, the log files (modsec_audit.log and modsec_debug.log) are created. The problem is that the files are empty and remain empty no matter what I do. I have even tried setting permissions on the files to 777.
Here are a couple of rules I created in an attempt to generate log entries:
SecRule REQUEST_BODY "viagra"
SecRule REMOTE_ADDR "^1.1.3.4$" auditlog,phase:1,allow
I put these in the same config file mentioned above. As far as I understand, the first rule should examine the request body (which would include data in POST requests) for the word, "viagra". Since my default action is phase:2,auditlog,log,pass,status:500, such requests should end up in the audit log. However, when I use a form on my site to post the word "viagra", nothing is generated in the log file.
The second rule, as far as I understand, should generate a log entry any time the IP address 1.2.3.4 is sent in the request headers. Instead of 1.2.3.4, of course, I have put in my real IP address. However, when I visit my server and browse pages, nothing is logged. I assume that my requests should generate log entries since I match the IP address.
I am currently running a few small websites that use a CMS. Two are Dragonfly and one is Joomla.
I am getting sporadic errors with both systems that, upon research, seem to be related to Apache and the mod_security module. I am getting the following error:
Code:
Not Acceptable
An appropriate representation of the requested resource /somefolder/index.php could not be found on this server.
Well, I'm no idiot (although some people may tend to disagree ) and after some searching, I found that this most likely points to an Apache error. Most solutions suggest to put the following in my .htacess file for the site:
Code:
<IfModule mod_security.c>
SecFilterEngine Off
SecFilterScanPOST Off
</IfModule>
It was noted that "SecFilterScanPOST Off" may or not be necessary. I have added the above to the .htaccess for each site (all 3 sites are subdomains) and have also added it to the .htaccess that is in the root folder for the site. Nothing has worked.
So my question is, is it possible that my webhost can override my .htaacess settings with their own? This is the only explanation that I can think of. But of course, I am no expert, which is why I turn to you good folks for help once again.
I want to add some more rules to to mod_security, however I am unsure if some of them are already being used.
So would it cause any problems if there are duplicate rules for the time being till I can check through all the rules?
I am having lots of problems installing mod_security on RH5 64 w/ Plesk.
mainly related to apr0, subversion, and the headers.
Any reason why everyone recommends to use version 1.94 of mod_security rather than the latest version available on www.modsecurity.org?
I've got this:
mod_security: Access denied with code 406. Error normalising REQUEST_URI: Invalid URL encoding detected: invalid characters used [hostname "www.mydomain.com"] [uri "/search/include/js_suggest/suggest.php?type=query&q=%u062E%u0636%u0631%u0627"]
how to disable/exclude this uri in mentioned host from being catched by mod_security?
how many people are actually using mod_security 2 instead of 1?
And why did you choose the version you did?
I tried using mod_security and mod_filter together. However, when I try to filter js files, I noticed that certain pages stop working, especially those using ajax.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI installed Mod_Security on my Cent OS server today and having some problem in configurating it.
Problem -
I have added this module in 'httpd.conf' file
Code:
<IfModule mod_security.c>
SecFilterEngine On
SecServerSignature "Apache"
SecFilterCheckUnicodeEncoding Off
SecAuditEngine RelevantOnly
SecAuditLog logs/audit_log
SecFilterScanPOST On
SecFilterDefaultAction "deny,log,status:403"
SecFilterSelective REQUEST_METHOD "^POST$" chain
SecFilterSelective HTTP_Content-Length "^$"
SecFilterSelective HTTP_Transfer-Encoding "!^$"
SecFilterSelective ARG_PHPSESSID "!^[0-9a-z]*$"
SecFilterSelective COOKIE_PHPSESSID "!^[0-9a-z]*$"
SecFilter "../"
SecFilter "viewtopic.php?" chain
SecFilter "chr(([0-9]{1,3}))" "deny,log"
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "wget "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "lynx "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "scp "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "ftp "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "cvs "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "rcp "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "curl "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "telnet "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "ssh "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "echo "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "links -dump "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "links -dump-charset "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "links -dump-width "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "links http:// "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "links ftp:// "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "links -source "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "mkdir "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "cd /tmp "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "cd /var/tmp "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "cd /etc/httpd/proxy "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "/config.php?v=1&DIR "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "/../../ "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "&highlight=%2527%252E "
SecFilterSelective THE_REQUEST "changedir=%2Ftmp%2F.php "
# Very crude filters to prevent SQL injection attacks
SecFilter "delete[[:space:]]+from"
SecFilter "insert[[:space:]]+into"
SecFilter "select.+from"
# Weaker XSS protection but allows common HTML tags
SecFilter "<[[:space:]]*script"
# Prevent XSS atacks (HTML/Javascript injection)
SecFilter "<(.|n)+>"
</IfModule>
But my website is multi forum hosting and requires 'index.php' file to pass parameter to make it work.
Example -
[url]
[url]
[url]
So i had to delete below mention code from above module.
Code:
SecFilterSelective REQUEST_METHOD "^POST$" chain
SecFilterSelective HTTP_Content-Length "^$"
SecFilterSelective HTTP_Transfer-Encoding "!^$"
SecFilterSelective ARG_PHPSESSID "!^[0-9a-z]*$"
SecFilterSelective COOKIE_PHPSESSID "!^[0-9a-z]*$"
SecFilter "../"
Is it possible to disable a particular mod_security rule for particular directory or the rules are global?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI just installed mod_security via WHM, and want to know what rule should I enter to prevent some URLs from being opened.
For example, if URL contains word "abc" (like domain.com/some_folder/abc/file.php), it should not be opened.
I have installed a new server with debian lenny 5, ISPConfig 3.0.1.1 and the newest mod_security and implemented the default rules.
I deactivated the rule detecting IP in pageheaders.
Then I got another problem. Some actions of ISPConfig are detected as "remote file access attempt", severity "critical", tag "web attack/file injection" data "/etc/"
detected by rule file crs_40 line 114, id 950005
question: how do I authorize ISPConfig and only ISPConfig to perform such requests on the server?
how to set the rules of MOD_Security.
Another question for professionals:
Q: What are the best rules to secure my server? I'd appreciate if you managed to attach these rules to your replies. // FYI, I host VBulletin portals.
Trying to use an RBL with ModSecurity but this matches everything whether listed or not.
SecRule REMOTE_ADDR "@rbl bb.barracudacentral.org" "log,deny,msg:'POST RBL Comment Spammer'"
What I would like to do is do an RBL lookup and any POST operations.
make this rules work on apache 2 mod_security 2?
View 4 Replies View RelatedAny good secure rules for mod_security 2 that work well for shared servers?
Can someone share what rules you are using to secure your shared servers. Have tried a few different sets of rules, but a few customers always end up with errors and disabling it for their domain name doesn't sound like a safer option for them or the server.
Share your mod_sec 2 rules.
How can i disable some words from the contain of the page by Mod_Security2?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI've been having the hardest time getting mod_security on my new CentOS 5.2 64-bit box.
Everything is a straight, simple, standard install - nothing special or custom. Plesk and all the apps that come with it installed fine, everything was going great. Then I tried to compile mod_sec, and things have been nothing but problems. I think I've finally sorted out the problems with the compiler, but now I get this error:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: i386 architecture of input file `.libs/msc_lua.o' is incompatible with i386:x86-64 output
Repeated, for every file it tries to link.
I installed new cPanel server and enabled modsecurity inside
WHM > Manage Plugins > modsecurity
When I create a phpinfo() file, it doesn't showup. Are they any configuration that I should do? How about adding the rules?
Anyone care to share a good set of mod_security SecFilters?
Trying to find a good set that will be good at preventing exploits, but not too restrictive that it starts interfering with everyday operations.