/proc/cpuinfo

Jul 7, 2007

Code:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 6
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.40GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 3392.618
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 6
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov$
bogomips : 6788.78

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 6
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.40GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 3392.618
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 1
cpu cores : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 6
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov$
bogomips : 6782.22

I see that there is clearly 2 processors. However, in the section for each processor it says cpu cores :2. Does that make this a dual core dual processor (4 cores)? I also see a core ID, which makes me think possibly it is just 1 processor with 2 cores.

View 9 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Godaddy Account - /proc/cpuinfo

Jul 30, 2009

So this is without a doubt the processor below:

[url]

Why does it list 8 separate entries?

Does this imply two physical L5410 processors?

Quote:

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5410 @ 2.33GHz
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 2327.671
cache size : 6144 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4657.61

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5410 @ 2.33GHz
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 2327.671
cache size : 6144 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4654.98

View 4 Replies View Related

4 Proc Opteron 854 2.8ghz Vs Single Proc Xeon 5460 3.16ghz Vs Xeon 5355 2.66ghz

Jul 11, 2008

planing to buy a new server a little confused which i should choose .... which server would you go for...

**** config 1 ****
4 Processor single core Opteron 854 2.8ghz (2.8ghz x 4)
4GB FB ECC RAM
2x 36gb 15,000 SA/SCSI
RAID 1

**** config 2 ****
Single processor Xeon 5460 3.16ghz (3.16ghz x 4)
2GB FB ECC RAM (config 1 with 4 gb ram)
2x 36gb 10,000 SA/SCSI (config 1 with 15k rpm sas drive)
RAID 1

**** config 3 ****
Single processor Xeon 5355 2.66ghz (2.66ghz x 4)
2GB FB ECC RAM (config 1 with 4 gb ram)
2x 36gb 10,000 SA/SCSI (config 1 with 15k rpm sas drive)
RAID 1

View 14 Replies View Related

Dual Proc Single Core Or Single Proc - Quad Core?

Jun 9, 2008

I cant decide between

Dual Processor Single Core
Dual Processor Single Core Xeon - 3.00GHz (Irwindale)

Or

Single Processor - Quad Core?
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield)

My site needs "raw" processing power due to the applications it runs. ram (over 2 gb) and hdd are not that important to me.

could someone point me in the right direction.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cat /proc/meminfo Cached Value Too High

May 26, 2009

I have bough a dedicated server with 2GB Ram, i have installed Hypervm and so surpise when my server is using most of my memory.

I type cat /proc/meminfo
[root@srv ~]# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 1784832 kB
MemFree: 47576 kB
Buffers: 62976 kB
Cached: 1454172 kB
SwapCached: 84 kB
Active: 251024 kB
Inactive: 1347412 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 1784832 kB
LowFree: 47576 kB
SwapTotal: 2097144 kB
SwapFree: 2096988 kB
Dirty: 96 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 81324 kB
Mapped: 26076 kB
Slab: 62488 kB
PageTables: 8844 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 2989560 kB
Committed_AS: 416152 kB
VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed: 2252 kB
VmallocChunk: 34359735799 kB

Is this normal when Cached: 1454172 kB?

View 3 Replies View Related

Single Proc. Multi Core OR Multi Proc. Single Core

Dec 3, 2008

What is the best configuration for a dedicated server? Trying to get my head round all the terminology as fast as I can.

Multi Processor Single Core
or
Single Processor Multi Core

View 12 Replies View Related

Single Proc Multi Core Vs Multi Proc Single Core

Jan 4, 2008

This is kind of a followup of our thread
"More RAM or better CPU?" [url].

Sorry if we were supposed to post in that thread in stead, but this is a different question that in that post.

Our server is still crashing a lot and unfortunately we can't afford a multi processor with multi cores.

So the question is as follows:
For a site with a lot of database activity, what would be the best thing to go for:

a) Single processor with multiple cores, or
b) Multiple processors with a single core.

a = Intel Xeon 3060 Dual Core Conroe Processor (2.4GHz)
b = 2x Intel Dual Xeon 2.8GHz Processors

View 10 Replies View Related

Linux Proc Command & Which HDD On Server Scsi Or Sata

Jun 20, 2008

1) what is the command to find out what processor is installed on the server

2) how do i find out what type on hdd i have sata or scsi?

whats the ssh command to find these two things out?

View 3 Replies View Related

Proc List Only Shows "/usr/bin/php" - No More File Names

Jan 8, 2008

We use cpanel on our centos servers and we've updated our servers recently using easyapache to the latest php4 and mod_suphp and I've noticed that in top (running "top c" in shell) all php processes by any user are simply displayed as "/usr/bin/php"

Before this update the processes also showed the file name eg. "/usr/bin/php lamescript.php" which allowed to easily find troublesome scripts ... but now there's no way of knowing what the script in question is that's eating up 100% of the cpu .. or is there?

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved